Selective Conductive Caps for Low-Resistance Interconnect Contacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in fabricating integrated circuits with smaller features is the increased resistance and capacitance due to reduced metal interconnect areas and contact resistance, exacerbated by existing capping materials that occupy excessive space and negatively impact device performance.

Innovation Solution

The use of selective deposition techniques for novel liner and cap materials, such as ruthenium-based liners and caps made of ruthenium, molybdenum, tungsten, rhodium, iridium, rhenium, and niobium, to encapsulate metal interconnects and transistor contacts, reducing resistance and improving reliability without occupying excessive space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing capping materials are used to encapsulate metal interconnects, then protection is provided, but excessive space is occupied and device performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of metal interconnectsVSAvoidspace occupied by cap materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by transitioning from conventional cap materials (such as tungsten or cobalt) to novel materials including ruthenium, rhodium, iridium, and their alloys. These material parameter changes enable achieving the same protective function with reduced thickness, thereby occupying less space while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures by combining different cap materials in multi-layer configurations (e.g., ruthenium-cobalt alloys, rhodium-iridium combinations). These composite structures provide enhanced protection efficiency, achieving superior protection with reduced overall cap thickness compared to single-material approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If metal interconnect areas are reduced to enable scaling, then device density increases, but resistance increases and performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidelectrical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in cap material properties, specifically selecting materials with lower resistivity (such as ruthenium and its alloys) to compensate for the reduced interconnect area. This material parameter optimization maintains electrical performance despite geometric scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by optimizing the cap thickness to be just sufficient for protection without excessive material deposition. This controlled, partial coverage approach maintains electrical conductivity while providing adequate protection, avoiding the performance degradation that would result from overly thick caps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If contact resistance is reduced to improve performance, then device performance enhances, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact resistanceVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite cap structures with multiple material layers (e.g., combining ruthenium with cobalt, or rhodium with iridium) that provide both low contact resistance and protection against fabrication process damage. This composite approach achieves superior electrical contact properties while maintaining fabrication process compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in reduced resistance and improved reliability of metal interconnects and contacts, enabling further scaling and performance enhancement in integrated circuits.

Implementation Method 1

a conductive cap material is selectively deposited over the interface material and the conductive fill material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS20250379149A1Selective conductive cap and liner deposition techniques for interconnects and contact structures
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 INTEL CORP
  • US20250379149A1 patent drawing
  • US20250379149A1 patent drawing
  • US20250379149A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Selective metal capping and/or liner materials and processes described herein may enable hermetically encapsulating metal interconnects and metal-silicon interfaces in transistor contacts. In one example, an IC structure includes an interconnect layer with a conductive interconnect that is lined with a ruthenium-based liner, and capped with a selectively deposited cap that includes one or more of ruthenium, molybdenum, tungsten, rhodium, iridium, rhenium, and niobium individually or in an alloy. In another example, an IC structure includes a transistor contact structure with a selectively deposited conductive cap over an interface material, where the conductive cap material is absent or substantially thinner on sidewalls of the contact opening. In one example, the conductive cap material over the Si-metal interface includes one or more of ruthenium, molybdenum, tungsten, rhodium, iridium, platinum, rhenium, cobalt, and niobium individually or in combination.