Selective DDA Access for Financial Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current financial transaction risk assessment systems face challenges in accurately evaluating borderline risk transactions, often leading to unnecessary declines that can result in lost sales and negative customer sentiment, due to the lack of integration of demand deposit account (DDA) information and the associated costs and resource expenditures of accessing such information.

Innovation Solution

Systems and methods are developed to selectively incorporate DDA information into risk assessments, allowing for intelligent decision-making on when and how to access DDA information, integrating it with other transaction and historical data to enhance the accuracy of risk evaluations and reduce unnecessary declines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If DDA information is accessed for every transaction, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but resource expenditure and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidresource expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of information access from universal (all transactions) to selective (borderline risk transactions only). By modifying the risk score threshold parameter and using it to dynamically control DDA information retrieval, the system achieves accurate risk assessment where needed while conserving resources for clear-cut cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying full DDA information access to all transactions (excessive action), the system applies partial action only to borderline risk transactions. This selective approach avoids unnecessary resource expenditure on transactions with clear risk profiles while maintaining accuracy for uncertain cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If DDA information is accessed for every transaction, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but customer wait time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidcustomer wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the risk score threshold parameter to determine whether to access DDA information. For transactions clearly above or below the threshold, the system skips DDA access and provides immediate approval or decline, significantly reducing customer wait time while maintaining accuracy for borderline cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the DDA information access step for transactions with clear risk profiles, rushing through the approval process immediately. This selective skipping eliminates unnecessary delays for low-risk transactions while ensuring thorough assessment for borderline cases that require DDA verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Reliability

If borderline risk transactions are preemptively declined, then risk management is improved, but sales opportunities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk managementVSAvoidsales performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk score threshold acts as an intermediary that identifies borderline transactions requiring further evaluation. Instead of automatically declining these transactions, the system uses the threshold to trigger selective DDA information access, which serves as a mediator to make informed decisions that balance risk management with sales opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from DDA information into the risk assessment process for borderline transactions. By retrieving actual account balance and status information and feeding it back into the decision-making process, the system can accurately distinguish between truly high-risk transactions and those that are merely uncertain due to lack of historical data, thereby preserving valid sales opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7873566B1Systems and methods for selectively accessing or using financial account data for subsequent risk determination
Publication Date: 2011.01.18 FIRST DATA CORP
  • US7873566B1 patent drawing
  • US7873566B1 patent drawing
  • US7873566B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for selectively determining when and from what source to access information received from a demand deposit account (DDA) associated with a given check or other promissory payment transaction, as well as for selectively incorporating the DDA information into a risk assessment for the transaction. Information received from the DDA can include an indication of the existence of sufficient funds in the account (or lack thereof) to cover the check in question, as well as a current status code for the account. Use of the DDA information may be integrated into an overall risk assessment process performed for the transaction, such that the influence of negative factors in one part of the risk assessment may be mitigated by other factors in the risk assessment and such that overall effectiveness of the risk assessment is enhanced. Systems and methods for selecting an access path for accessing a DDA to settle a promissory payment are also provided.