Selective Digital Rights Management Options for User Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users have limited control over digital rights management (DRM) solutions installed on their devices, which can impact their privacy and understanding of content protection measures, as these solutions often have far-reaching permissions and are not transparently managed.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines and infers digital rights management solutions supported by a content source, provides users with options based on these solutions, and allows them to select which DRM options to use, offering transparency and control over content access and usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If content protection or digital rights management solutions are implemented to protect media content, then content security and rights protection are improved, but user control and transparency over system permissions are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent securityVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the DRM solution into multiple selectable components or permission levels, allowing users to choose specific protection mechanisms rather than accepting a monolithic DRM system. This enables users to grant only the necessary permissions for their intended use case, improving both security (by using appropriate protection levels) and user control (by allowing selective acceptance).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the DRM implementation based on user preferences and content requirements. Users can modify their DRM settings and permission choices over time, and the system adjusts the level of content protection accordingly. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making DRM flexible rather than static, allowing users to maintain control while still receiving appropriate security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If comprehensive digital rights management solutions are deployed to control content consumption, then content protection effectiveness is improved, but user understanding and awareness of DRM implications are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent protection effectivenessVSAvoiduser understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the DRM system and the user that translates technical DRM concepts into understandable information. This intermediary component explains the implications of different DRM options in user-friendly terms, allowing users to make informed decisions without needing to understand the complex technical details of content protection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users about the implications of their DRM choices and the state of content protection. This includes informing users about what permissions are being granted, what content is protected, and how their selections affect their ability to consume content. This feedback loop improves user understanding while maintaining effective content protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If DRM solutions with far-reaching permissions are implemented to protect content, then content security is improved, but invasiveness and user expectation are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent securityVSAvoidinvasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing DRM protection only where specifically needed rather than applying comprehensive permissions system-wide. Users can select which applications or content types should have DRM protection, and the system implements protection only in those specific locations. This reduces overall invasiveness while maintaining security where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial DRM protection based on user selection rather than full comprehensive protection. Users can choose to enable DRM for specific content or applications, and the system applies protection only to those selected areas. This partial approach reduces invasiveness compared to full-system DRM while still providing adequate security for protected content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10037414B2Enhanced user control for content protection solutions
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10037414B2 patent drawing
  • US10037414B2 patent drawing
  • US10037414B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to enhanced user control for content protection solutions. An options component determines or infers a set of digital rights management solutions supported by a content source, and a data component determines or infers information associated with respective digital rights management solutions supported by the content source. The set of digital rights management solutions can further be supported by a client device. A prompt component provides a user a set of digital rights management options based at least in part on the set of digital rights management solutions supported by the content source and the information, and enables the user to select zero or more of the digital rights management options. The content source can enable access for a subset of associated content based at least in part on the selections of the user.