Selective Fault Recovery for Electronic Subsystems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices often undergo full system shutdown when a fault occurs in one of their subsystems, causing significant interruptions to users and lacking effective recovery options.

Innovation Solution

Implementing selective fault recovery techniques that allow the device to continue operating by attempting to recover the faulty subsystem using various recovery methods, including state and power resets, while providing users with options to isolate or reset the faulty component, thereby minimizing disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a full system shutdown is performed when a fault occurs in a subsystem, then system stability is maintained, but device availability and user productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoiddevice availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into independent subsystems with individual fault detection and recovery mechanisms. Each subsystem can be isolated and recovered independently without affecting the entire device, allowing selective fault recovery that maintains overall system availability while ensuring stability through targeted intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A fault recovery manager acts as an intermediary between subsystem faults and system-wide responses. This mediator evaluates fault severity, determines appropriate recovery actions, and coordinates subsystem isolation or reset operations, preventing unnecessary full system shutdowns while maintaining system stability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple recovery methods are implemented for faulty subsystems, then fault recovery capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault recovery capabilityVSAvoidrecovery mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recovery mechanism employs dynamic, adaptive fault recovery methods that adjust based on fault type and severity. The system implements a hierarchy of recovery strategies (subsystem reset, subsystem isolation, system reset) that are selectively applied, providing robust recovery capability while managing complexity through conditional logic rather than always-active mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of the faulty subsystem (power state, operational mode) as part of the recovery process. By modifying subsystem parameters rather than hardware configuration, the system achieves effective fault recovery without adding physical complexity to the device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9026842B2Selective fault recovery of subsystems
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD
  • US9026842B2 patent drawing
  • US9026842B2 patent drawing
  • US9026842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are described herein with regards to performing a selective fault recovery for an electronic device having a plurality of subsystems in which one of the subsystems has a fault. The selective fault recovery techniques described herein allow a user to use non-faulty subsystem of the electronic device while selective fault recovery is being conducted on the subsystem having the fault.