Selective Filter Gas Sensing for Formaldehyde Cross-Sensitivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air pollution sensing technologies face challenges in accurately measuring pollutant concentrations, particularly formaldehyde, due to cross-sensitivity issues and the need for costly, time-consuming laboratory analysis, which limits their effectiveness in providing real-time and continuous monitoring.

Innovation Solution

An air purification system that includes a selective filter and a gas sensor, where the gas sensor response is measured before and after filtering, allowing a controller to process these readings and determine pollutant concentration using the sensitivity characteristics of the sensor, enabling accurate and automated monitoring of pollutant levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electrochemical based sensors are used to measure pollutant concentration, then the measurement can be performed continuously and automatically, but cross-sensitivity to other gases reduces measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous measurement capabilityVSAvoidpollutant concentration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor response is segmented into contributions from different gases. By measuring the total sensor response and separately measuring or estimating responses to interfering gases (alcohols, aldehydes), the contribution from the target pollutant (formaldehyde) can be isolated through subtraction, improving measurement precision while maintaining continuous monitoring capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Additional sensors act as intermediaries to measure interfering gases. By introducing secondary sensors that detect specific interfering substances (such as alcohol sensors or aldehyde sensors), their contributions to the total sensor response can be quantified and subtracted, thereby improving the accuracy of formaldehyde measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If gas chromatography analysis is used to measure pollutant concentration, then measurement precision is improved, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant concentration accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive electrochemical sensors that provide sufficient accuracy for continuous monitoring applications. These sensors can be replaced or recalibrated periodically, offering a cost-effective alternative to expensive gas chromatography equipment while providing continuous real-time data rather than periodic laboratory analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical and chemical complex process of gas chromatography is replaced with electrochemical sensing. The patent substitutes the sophisticated gas chromatography system with simpler electrochemical sensors that directly measure gas concentrations through electrochemical reactions, dramatically reducing measurement time from hours/days to seconds/minutes while maintaining adequate precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a simple filter structure is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision of filter components becomes more critical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter structure complexityVSAvoidfilter component tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous filter materials with well-defined pore structures that provide effective filtration through their inherent physical structure. The porous nature of the filter media allows for effective separation of particles and gases through diffusion and adsorption mechanisms, reducing the need for complex precision manufacturing while maintaining filter effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system provides a cost-effective and efficient method for accurately monitoring pollutant concentrations, reducing cross-sensitivity issues and enabling automated operation, thus ensuring improved indoor air quality by providing reliable and continuous data on pollutant levels.

Implementation Method 1

A filter for selectively filtering a target pollutant from a gas, wherein the filter has a significantly smaller effect in reducing concentrations of other gases to which the sensor is cross-sensitive than in reducing the concentration of the target pollutant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP3559560B1A system and method for measuring a concentration of a pollutant within a gas
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3559560B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2
  • EP3559560B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3559560B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An air purification system is provided which includes measurement of a concentration of a target pollutant within the air. A gas sensor is used for sensing a concentration of the pollutant (although it will detect other pollutants as well due to cross- sensitivity). A filter is provided which selectively removes the target pollutant while having a significantly smaller effect in reducing other pollutants to which the sensor is cross-sensitive. A gas sensor response is obtained before filtering, a gas sensor response after filtering, and the sensitivity characteristics of the gas sensor to the pollutant are processed, thereby to determine a gas concentration of the pollutant in the air before filtering. In this way, the concentration measurement is better than a direct measurement with the gas sensor as a result of a low selectivity of the gas sensor.