Selective L4S Queue Access for Congestion-Aware Traffic Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional congestion control mechanisms, such as Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput (L4S), face limitations due to assumptions about application compatibility and resource allocation challenges, leading to suboptimal use of network resources and increased latency in high-traffic scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A queue assigner maintains a record of previous preferential queue requests by applications, granting preferential status only if certain conditions are met, such as a threshold time period and data percentage, to incentivize selective use of low-latency queues and conserve network resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If L4S dual queueing is implemented to reduce latency for latency-sensitive traffic, then low-latency performance is improved, but network resource allocation becomes complex and classic traffic performance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidqueue management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic queue selection where applications can switch between L4S and classic queues based on real-time latency requirements and network conditions. The queue assigner dynamically evaluates traffic characteristics and assigns packets to appropriate queues, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions rather than using static queue allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different queueing treatments to different portions of the same application's traffic based on local characteristics. Latency-sensitive packets (e.g., game state updates) are routed to the L4S queue while non-latency-sensitive packets (e.g., chat messages) use the classic queue, allowing optimized handling for each packet's specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of time

If applications are encouraged to use L4S queue for all traffic, then latency-sensitive applications benefit, but network resources are misallocated and non-latency-sensitive traffic consumes preferential queue capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidnetwork resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial L4S queue utilization where only the necessary portion of traffic requiring low latency is assigned to the L4S queue. The queue assigner evaluates each packet or flow to determine if L4S treatment is truly needed, avoiding excessive use of the preferential queue for traffic that would be adequately served by the classic queue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the queue assigner monitors queue utilization, latency measurements, and traffic characteristics to continuously optimize queue assignments. This feedback loop ensures that L4S queue resources are allocated efficiently based on actual network conditions and application requirements rather than blanket assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If preferential queue requests are granted without verification, then applications receive low-latency treatment, but queue congestion increases and QoE for other applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidqueue performance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The queue assigner performs preliminary evaluation of queue conditions and application requirements before granting L4S queue access. This preliminary action includes assessing current queue congestion levels, verifying the application's latency sensitivity, and determining if L4S assignment is appropriate, preventing premature or inappropriate preferential treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables applications to self-identify their latency requirements through proper packet marking and protocol indicators. The queue assigner relies on these self-service indicators from applications to make informed queue assignment decisions, reducing the need for complex centralized control while maintaining appropriate queue allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260052112A1Queue protection with selective l4s use
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US20260052112A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052112A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Use of a preferential resource, such as a Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput queue of a device, may be selectively enabled based on past resource-requesting behavior of a sending application. A characteristic, such as an Explicit Congestion Notification bit, of network traffic transmitted by a sending application is detected during a data traffic congestion condition at a receiving network node. If this characteristic indicates a request for processing via a preferential queue, then a prior network traffic transmission profile of the sending application may be identified, based on which it is determined whether the sending application has not, within a threshold time period, previously transmitted prior network traffic that indicated a prior request for the processing via the preferential queue. Accordingly, access to the preferential queue may be granted, or may be made more likely, for data packets of the current network traffic of the sending application.