Selective M4 Antagonist Compounds for Parkinson's Adverse-Effect Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonists used for treating Parkinson's disease have dose-limiting adverse effects due to non-selectivity across mAChR subtypes, limiting their clinical efficacy and causing peripheral adverse effects and cognitive disturbances.

Innovation Solution

Development of compounds that selectively target the M4 mAChR subtype to antagonize its function, reducing adverse effects and enhancing therapeutic efficacy for Parkinson's disease and related disorders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-selective mAChR antagonists are used to treat Parkinson's disease, then antiparkinsonian effects are achieved, but dose-limiting adverse effects occur that restrict clinical utility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantiparkinsonian efficacyVSAvoidperipheral adverse effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing compounds with selective affinity for specific mAChR subtypes (particularly M1, M3, and M4) rather than non-selective antagonism. The chemical structures are optimized to target specific receptor subtypes expressed in the brain, allowing therapeutic effects to be achieved while minimizing activation of peripheral receptors that cause adverse effects. This subtype-selective approach enables the drug to act locally on central nervous system targets without broadly affecting peripheral muscarinic receptors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If doses of mAChR antagonists are increased to achieve more complete blockade, then antiparkinsonian effects are enhanced, but adverse effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantiparkinsonian efficacyVSAvoidperipheral adverse effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical structure parameters of mAChR antagonists to achieve subtype selectivity. By changing molecular characteristics such as substituent groups, ring structures, and spatial configuration, the compounds exhibit preferential binding to central mAChR subtypes over peripheral receptors. This allows therapeutic doses to be achieved with complete or near-complete blockade of target receptors while maintaining lower overall doses that avoid peripheral toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If selective M4 antagonists are developed, then peripheral adverse effects are reduced, but compound complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperipheral adverse effectsVSAvoidcompound structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the mAChR antagonist class into distinct subtype-specific agents. Rather than developing a single non-selective compound, the invention segments the therapeutic approach into selective antagonists for M1, M3, and M4 subtypes. Each segmented compound has a tailored molecular structure optimized for its specific target, achieving peripheral selectivity through this functional segmentation of the drug class.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies composite materials by creating complex molecular structures that combine multiple structural elements with specific properties. The selective antagonists incorporate various substituent groups, heterocyclic rings, and stereochemical features that collectively provide subtype selectivity. These composite molecular structures integrate multiple functional components that work together to achieve selective binding to central mAChR subtypes while avoiding peripheral receptor interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12630540B2(4-(6-((2-octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrol-5-yl)amino)pyridazin-3-yl)phenyl)(imino)(methyl)-LAMBDA6-sulfanone derivatives and similar compounds as muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4 antagonists for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 VANDERBILT UNIV
  • US12630540B2 patent drawing
  • US12630540B2 patent drawing
  • US12630540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are compounds of formula (I) wherein G1 is as antagonists of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4 (mAChR M4) for use in the treatment of e.g. a neurodegenerative disorder, a movement disorder, or a brain disorder, such as e.g. Parkinson's disease, drug-induced Parkinsonism, dystonia, Tourette's syndrome, dyskinesias, schizophrenia, cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia, excessive daytime sleepiness, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Huntington's disease, chorea, cerebral palsy, and progressive supranuclear palsy. An exemplary compound is e.g. (2,5-difluoro-4-(6-(((3aR,5s,6aS)-2-((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)methyl)octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrol-5-yl)amino)pyridazin-3-yl)phenyl)(imino)(methyl)-λ6-sulfanone (e.g. example 12; compound no. 7) Pharmacological data on the activity of the compounds in an mAChR M4 cell-based assay are provided (e.g. table 2).TABLE 2Human M4Cpd. No.IC50 (nM)Emin (%)*113.44239.62318.5345846575.4361883746.0385607918.43101.821186.231243.42138.63*% ACh maximum at 30 μM.