Selective Video Mute in Conference Streams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video conference systems cannot selectively provide a video feed to some participants while withholding it from others, requiring either all-or-none approaches, which is counterproductive in scenarios like legal discussions where privacy control is needed.

Innovation Solution

The system generates two discrete conference streams: one with video and audio for approved participants and another with audio and a redacted or obscured video for unapproved participants, allowing selective video sharing within the same conference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If video feed is provided to all participants, then all participants receive complete conference content, but privacy control is lost and video cannot be selectively shared

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective video sharing capabilityVSAvoidstream management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conference video stream is segmented into multiple versions: a first conference stream containing video from all participants, and a second conference stream with video selectively muted for specific participants. The server divides the unified conference content into differentiated streams based on participant permissions, enabling selective video sharing without requiring separate communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels of video content are provided to different participants based on their permissions. Approved participants receive the complete video stream, while unapproved participants receive a version with specific video feeds muted. This allows each participant to receive video content tailored to their specific access rights within the same conference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If video is muted for specific participants, then privacy is protected, but video must be completely disabled for all participants in prior art

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy controlVSAvoidvideo sharing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts video stream composition based on participant permissions and roles. The server continuously evaluates which participants should receive video from which sources and dynamically assembles appropriate stream configurations. This allows flexible, real-time control over video visibility without requiring static, all-or-noone approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of video stream composition by selectively muting video feeds from specific participants in the second conference stream while maintaining them in the first stream. This parameter adjustment (video presence/absence) is controlled based on participant permissions, enabling fine-grained privacy control within a single conference environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If separate communication channels are established for different video permissions, then selective video sharing is achieved, but device complexity and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective video sharingVSAvoidcommunication channel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple permission-based video stream configurations are merged into a single conference environment. Instead of requiring separate communication channels for different video permission levels, the system combines multiple stream versions (first stream with all video, second stream with selective muting) within one conference session, managed by a single server that handles both stream types simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The conference server performs multiple functions: it generates the unified first conference stream for participants needing full video access, simultaneously generates the second conference stream with selective video muting for participants requiring privacy restrictions, and manages both streams within a single conference session. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230353405A1Selective mute of video streams in video conferences
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 AVAYA MANAGEMENT LP
  • US20230353405A1 patent drawing
  • US20230353405A1 patent drawing
  • US20230353405A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Remote conferences often comprise audio and video feed signals originating from a number of participants' communication devices. A participant may disable a cameras or microphones but doing so affects every other participant equally. Embodiments provided herein are directed to enabling a participant to mute a video feed presented to some but not all participants of the conference. At the same time audio may be provided to every participant.