Self-adaptive SCS therapy generation via physiological monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices are inefficient and inconvenient, relying on manual, time-consuming processes for setting and adjusting electrical parameters, lacking intelligence and self-adaptation to patient physiological changes, and requiring frequent physician interventions for optimal pain relief.

Innovation Solution

A self-adaptive system that integrates sensors to monitor physiological parameters, uses neural networks and genetic algorithms to automatically detect discomfort, classify pain levels, and generate optimal stimulation programs, allowing the device to adapt and learn without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual trial-and-error methods are used to set electrical parameters, then the system is simple to operate, but it is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors physiological parameters and generates stimulation programs without requiring manual intervention. The processor self-adjusts electrical parameters based on real-time sensor data, eliminating the need for trial-and-error manual settings and significantly improving parameter setting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors physiological parameters through sensors and uses this feedback to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to patient conditions in real-time, improving efficiency while maintaining appropriate system complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system lacks self-adaptation capabilities, then the device complexity is lower, but it cannot adapt to patient physiological changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to patient changesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts stimulation parameters based on real-time physiological monitoring. The processor automatically modifies electrical parameters in response to changing patient conditions, enabling the system to adapt to patient physiological changes while managing complexity through programmed adaptation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment based on sensor feedback without requiring external intervention. The processor automatically generates and modifies stimulation programs according to monitored physiological parameters, providing adaptability to patient changes while containing system complexity within the automated control framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If frequent physician interventions are required, then the system remains simple, but it increases time loss and medical costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for physician visitsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors physiological parameters and generates appropriate stimulation programs without requiring frequent physician interventions. This self-service capability reduces the time needed for physician visits while managing complexity through automated monitoring and control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses continuous physiological monitoring feedback to automatically adjust stimulation parameters, eliminating the need for frequent manual adjustments by physicians. This feedback mechanism reduces time loss for medical visits while containing system complexity within the automated control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Extent of automation

If the system does not automatically detect discomfort, then the device is simpler, but it cannot provide intelligent pain management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic discomfort detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical monitoring with automated electronic sensing and processing. Sensors automatically detect physiological parameters related to discomfort, and the processor interprets this data to trigger appropriate stimulation programs, providing intelligent pain management while managing complexity through electronic automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors and detects patient discomfort through physiological sensors without requiring manual assessment. The processor self-evaluates sensor data and automatically initiates appropriate stimulation programs, providing intelligent pain management while containing complexity within the automated detection and response system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7463927B1Self-adaptive system for the automatic detection of discomfort and the automatic generation of SCS therapies for chronic pain control
Publication Date: 2008.12.09 INTELLIGENT NEUROSTIMULATION MICROSYST
  • US7463927B1 patent drawing
  • US7463927B1 patent drawing
  • US7463927B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for treating pain consisting of an “add-on” module integrated within the implantable pulse generator (IPG) component of IPG spinal cord stimulators, or, alternatively, integrated within the radiofrequency (RF) transmitter component of RF spinal cord stimulators. The system automatically and continuously monitors, measures, and classifies multiple patient physiological parameters without human intervention. The system also classifies qualitative perceptive changes felt by the patient. On the basis of this input vector information, the system automatically and continuously generates the most appropriate stimulation programs to improve, alleviate, or eliminate the patient's pain without human intervention. The system automatically and continuously adapts itself to both quantitative physiological changes within the patient and qualitative perceptive changes felt by the patient.