Computerized Self-Awareness Training System for Conflict Resolution
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current self-enhancement programs lack the combination of deep personal self-awareness and interpersonal skills necessary to achieve a balanced 'turbo evolution' state, leading to inefficiencies in personal and organizational performance due to unaddressed conflicts and friction.
Innovation Solution
A computerized training system that assesses an individual's intelligence, assets, and perceptual orientations, generating a profile report to facilitate self-awareness and conflict resolution through cross-intelligence communication and creative partnership tools.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If current self-enhancement programs use basic behavioral modification or self-assessment, then the program simplicity is maintained, but deep personal self-awareness and interpersonal skill balance cannot be achieved
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the self-enhancement process into three distinct intelligence assessments (Logical, Emotional, Intuitive) and multiple asset categories (Technical, Psychological, Relational). This segmentation allows for precise measurement of different aspects of self-awareness while managing complexity through modular assessment components.
Solution Approach 2:
The computerized training system serves multiple functions: it assesses intelligence makeup, evaluates asset strengths, identifies perceptual orientations, generates profile reports, and provides training recommendations. This multi-functionality achieves comprehensive self-awareness measurement without requiring separate systems for each function.
2Loss of information
If only self-awareness tools are provided, then insight capability is improved, but interpersonal skill development is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The system merges self-awareness assessment with interpersonal skill development by integrating intelligence assessment results with asset evaluation and perceptual orientation analysis. The generated profile reports combine insights from all three assessments to provide comprehensive guidance for both self-understanding and interpersonal effectiveness.
Solution Approach 2:
The system provides feedback by generating profile reports that show individuals their intelligence makeup, asset strengths, and perceptual orientations. This feedback loop enables individuals to understand their strengths and weaknesses, then apply this knowledge to improve both self-awareness and interpersonal interactions.
3Productivity
If only interpersonal skill training is provided, then action capability is improved, but self-awareness depth is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary action by conducting comprehensive intelligence and asset assessments before providing interpersonal skill training. The profile reports generated from these assessments provide a foundation for targeted training, ensuring that interpersonal skill development is based on accurate self-knowledge.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes parameters by assessing multiple dimensions of intelligence (Logical, Emotional, Intuitive) and assets (Technical, Psychological, Relational) to create a comprehensive profile. These parameter changes enable precise measurement of self-awareness while guiding interpersonal skill development based on individual characteristics.
4Measurement precision
If comprehensive intelligence and asset assessment is conducted, then profile accuracy is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system replaces manual assessment methods with computerized processing. The computer automatically calculates intelligence scores, evaluates asset strengths, determines perceptual orientations, and generates profile reports. This substitution maintains high measurement precision while significantly reducing the time required for comprehensive assessment.
Data Source
AI summary
A computerized training system and methods are provided for training an individual in self-evaluation and to interact with a partner. The training system and methods comprise an intelligence assessor to identify an intelligence makeup of the individual by scoring a completed intelligence questionnaire. Intelligences include Logic, Emotion and Intuition. An asset assessor assesses the strength of Three Assets of the individual by scoring a completed asset questionnaire. Assets include a Technical, a Psychological, and a Relational asset. A perception assayer identifies a dominant Perceptual Orientation of the individual by cross referencing the intelligence makeup with the viewpoint of the individual. An aggregator collects the profile information of the individual to generate an innate profile report and a self-insight report of the individual. A facilitator aids in exploring the insight report. A synchronizer may synchronize the individual with a partner by forming a dyad between the individual and the partner. A trainer may also train the individual to resolve conflicts with the partner.