Self-Balancing Shaker With Synchronized Eccentric Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orbital shakers for agitating substances in microtiter plates become increasingly complex, expensive, and bulky due to the need for counterbalancing mechanisms, which also complicate maintenance and service.

Innovation Solution

A shaker apparatus that utilizes a rotating assembly of eccentric structures with synchronized cranks and racks, where the eccentric structures counteract each other's forces and torques, eliminating the need for traditional counterweights, allowing for a lightweight, compact design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional counterweights are used to balance the eccentric load, then the shaker achieves dynamic balance, but the device becomes more complex, larger, and heavier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic balanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies counterweight principle by positioning the motor's rotor as a counterbalancing mass opposite to the eccentric crank assembly. The rotor's mass is specifically calculated to offset the centrifugal force generated by the eccentric crank, achieving dynamic balance without requiring additional counterweight components. This integrates the balancing function into the existing motor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the motor rotor with the counterweight function. Instead of using a separate counterweight component, the rotor itself serves dual purposes: generating rotational motion for the crank and providing the counterbalancing mass. This integration eliminates additional parts and simplifies the overall structure while maintaining dynamic balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the mass of the shaker is increased to stabilize against eccentric movement, then the shaker achieves better balance, but the device becomes heavier and more cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalance stabilityVSAvoidshaker weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the motor rotor as a counterweight to balance the eccentric crank assembly. By positioning the rotor's mass opposite to the eccentric mass and calculating its weight to match the centrifugal force, the system achieves balance without adding extra mass. The counterbalancing effect is achieved through proper mass distribution rather than increasing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the mass and position parameters of the rotor to achieve dynamic balance. By carefully selecting the rotor's mass and its position relative to the eccentric crank, the system achieves balance stability without increasing the overall weight of the shaker. This parameter optimization allows the existing components to serve dual functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If fixed counterweights at specific locations are used, then the shaker achieves balance, but the device requires more space and becomes bulkier

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebalanceVSAvoidshaker size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motor rotor with the counterweight function, eliminating the need for separate counterweight components. This integration allows the balancing function to be achieved within the existing motor housing space, reducing the overall volume required for the shaker while maintaining balance stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent positions the rotor's mass opposite to the eccentric crank assembly to create a counterbalancing effect. By utilizing the existing motor structure and positioning the counterbalancing mass within the motor housing, the system achieves balance without requiring additional space for separate counterweight components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Stability of the object's composition

If adjustable counterweights with servomotors are used, then the shaker achieves dynamic compensation, but the device requires sensors, control units, and becomes more expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic compensationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-balancing through the mechanical design where the motor rotor automatically counterbalances the eccentric crank assembly during rotation. The system does not require external sensors or control units to detect and adjust the balance, as the counterbalancing effect is inherently generated by the rotor's mass and position. The system self-regulates through its mechanical configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the motor rotor as a fixed counterweight that automatically compensates for the eccentric load during operation. The counterbalancing effect is achieved through the rotor's mass and position, which are designed to offset the centrifugal force generated by the eccentric crank. This passive counterbalancing eliminates the need for active control systems, sensors, or servomotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves dynamic balance by canceling out linear forces and torques, resulting in a shaker that is lighter, faster, and more compact while maintaining effective agitation, mixing, or blending capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

forces produced by movement of the eccentric structures oppose and counteract

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

a crank means adapted to provide circular motion, where a centre of mass of the eccentric structure moves in said circular motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCircular motion:

Data Source

PatentEP3960285B1Self-balancing shaker
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 TI INITIATIVES APS
  • EP3960285B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3960285B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3960285B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

There is a need for a lightweight and simple shaking equipment. There is provided a shaker apparatus (100) for agitating, mixing or blending substances, the shaker apparatus (100) having a shaker body (101) and the shaker (100) further comprising: - an eccentric structure (110) having: - a crank means (111) adapted to provide circular motion, - a rack (113) for holding trays or containers and supported by the shaker body (101) through a guide (114) that disallows rack rotation in the plane of the circular motion of the crank means (111), the rack being kinematically linked to said crank means (111) to receive said circular motion, where when the crank means moves the rack in the circular motion, a centre of mass of the eccentric structure (110) moves in said circular motion around a transposed axis, - wherein said shaker apparatus (100) comprises a set of such eccentric structures (110, 120) forming a first rotating assembly (180) whose crank means (111, 121) provide circular motion having a first synchronised spin (S1), when the shaker apparatus (100) is in use, where said rotating assembly (180) has a centre of mass at least substantially on a referential line (104) normal to the plane of the circular motion, and where relative angular locations of the centres of mass of the eccentric structures (110, 120) along the path of their circular motion are predetermined for the rotating assembly (180) so that when the shaker apparatus (100) is in use, forces produced by movement of the eccentric structures oppose and counteract.