Self-balancing surfboard with sensor-based stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motorized surfboard systems for inland surfing are difficult to control, even for skilled surfers, due to the complexity of hand-held throttles and lack of precise control mechanisms, making it challenging to perform basic maneuvers.

Innovation Solution

A watercraft system featuring a board with integrated motor propulsion, tilt sensors, and a computer-controlled steering system that uses force sensors to detect rider positioning and adjust thrust and direction, allowing for automatic stabilization and maneuvering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If hand-held throttles are used to control motorized surfboards, then the motor can be controlled to increase thrust, but the system becomes difficult to control and even talented surfers struggle to perform basic maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor thrustVSAvoidcontrol difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The surfboard system automatically detects rider tilt and foot position through sensors and adjusts motor thrust and steering accordingly, eliminating the need for manual throttle control. The system serves itself by autonomously responding to rider inputs through body positioning rather than requiring manual intervention via hand-held throttles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates tilt sensors and force sensors that continuously monitor rider position and provide feedback to the control system. This feedback loop enables automatic adjustment of motor parameters based on rider姿态, making the system responsive and easy to control without manual throttles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If tilt sensors and force sensors are integrated into the board to detect rider positioning, then automatic stabilization and maneuvering can be achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic stabilizationVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensors (tilt sensors, force sensors) and the motor control system are integrated into a unified control architecture that processes sensor data and coordinates motor responses. This merging reduces overall system complexity by creating a cohesive control system rather than separate independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system serves multiple functions: detecting rider tilt for stabilization, detecting foot position for maneuver control, and providing feedback for automatic thrust adjustment. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized sensors for each function, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the steering system directs water flow to turn the watercraft based on tilt sensor detection, then maneuverability is improved, but the system requires precise coordination between sensors and steering

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidsteering control coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system uses real-time feedback from tilt sensors to automatically adjust water flow direction. The control system continuously monitors tilt data and coordinates steering actuator responses, creating a seamless feedback loop that simplifies maneuver control while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical steering linkages with a control system that uses sensor data to electronically control water flow direction. This substitution of mechanical systems with sensor-based control reduces mechanical complexity while improving maneuverability and coordination precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system simplifies the experience of surfing on inland waters by providing automatic stabilization and control, enabling riders to maintain balance and perform maneuvers with ease, even for beginners.

Implementation Method 1

a first tilt sensor configured to detect a first rotation of at least a first portion of the board in a counter-clockwise direction relative to the central axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a motor coupled to the board and configured to propel the board

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Implementation Method 3

a steering system configured to turn the watercraft by directing water flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow direction control:

Data Source

PatentUS10358194B1Self-balancing surfboard
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 WENGREEN SHELBY JEAN
  • US10358194B1 patent drawing
  • US10358194B1 patent drawing
  • US10358194B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A board can have an upward-facing side arranged to enable a person to stand on the board while surfing. A motor can be attached to a downward-facing side of the board to propel the board. A computer system can use data from sensors and a steering system to actively respond to actions from the person riding on the board.