Self-Balancing Two-Wheel Mobility Aid for Confined Spaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mobility aid devices, such as wheelchairs, are unsuitable for navigating confined spaces and require assistance due to their bulkiness and instability, limiting the mobility and independence of users with mobility impairments, which can lead to mental stress and reduced self-esteem.

Innovation Solution

A mobility aid device with two independently drivable wheels that are self-balancing, allowing for compact maneuverability and easy access to various environments, featuring a motor arrangement, adjustable seating, and a control module that manages electrical signals to maintain balance and facilitate movement in tight spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional wheelchairs use four wheels for stability, then stability is improved, but the device becomes bulky and unsuitable for confined spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The wheelchair is divided into functional modules: a compact frame structure, independent wheel assemblies, and separable components. This segmentation allows the wheelchair to maintain stability through precise structural design while minimizing overall volume for better maneuverability in confined spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a traditional four-wheel configuration to a two-wheel design, fundamentally changing the dimensional arrangement of support points. This dimensional change enables the wheelchair to achieve stability through alternative mechanical principles while significantly reducing the device's footprint and improving access to narrow areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If motor arrangements are added to assist mobility, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility assistanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor arrangement is designed to perform multiple functions: providing propulsive force for forward movement, enabling directional control through differential wheel rotation, and potentially assisting with elevation adjustments. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanical systems, thereby managing complexity while enhancing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system incorporates self-regulating features where the motor arrangement automatically adjusts power distribution to wheels based on terrain conditions and user input, reducing the need for complex manual control mechanisms and simplifying the overall system while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Volume of moving object

If two wheels are used for compactness, then maneuverability in confined spaces is improved, but stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The wheelchair incorporates preliminary stabilization features such as pre-positioned counterweights, pre-tensioned structural elements, and predictive control algorithms that anticipate balance adjustments. These preliminary actions ensure stability is maintained even with the reduced two-wheel configuration, allowing compact design without sacrificing safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms through sensors that continuously monitor the wheelchair's tilt angle, wheel position, and load distribution. This real-time feedback is processed by the control module, which adjusts motor output to maintain balance and stability, enabling the compact two-wheel design to perform as stably as traditional four-wheel configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Volume of moving object

If wheels are contained within 120% of seating area for compactness, then maneuverability is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel assemblies are merged with the main frame structure through integrated mounting systems, where wheel hubs serve as structural nodes that simultaneously provide support, rotation, and structural rigidity. This merging eliminates the need for separate suspension and mounting components, achieving compact wheel placement within 120% of seating area while managing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables users to operate the device safely, comfortably, and efficiently in confined spaces, enhancing mobility and independence while reducing reliance on caregivers and improving quality of life.

Implementation Method 1

a mobility aid device which is driven in operation from a motor arrangement included in the main unit and/or the wheel arrangement, wherein the mobility aid device is propelled forwards or backwards, and turned by the motor arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the mobility aid device is self-balancing using the two wheels by employing a control module that controls an electrical signal that is applied to the motor arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeedback control: Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3820421B1Mobility aid device
Publication Date: 2024.04.17 CENTAUR ROBOTICS LTD
  • EP3820421B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3820421B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3820421B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is disclosed a mobility aid device including a seat arrangement upon which a user sits when the mobility device aid is in operation, a main unit that supports the seat arrangement, and a wheel arrangement that supports the main unit on a floor surface. The mobility aid device is driven in operation from a motor arrangement included in at least one of the main unit and the wheel arrangement, wherein the mobility device aid is propelled forwards or backwards and turned by the motor arrangement. The wheel arrangement includes two wheels mounted at lateral sides of main unit, wherein the two wheels are mutually independently driven in operation by the motor arrangement. The mobility aid device is self-balancing using the two wheels by employing a control module that controls an electrical signal applied to the motor arrangement, and the wheels are contained within an area that is less than 120% of a seating area of the seat arrangement.