Self-Centering Arrowhead Blade Assembly for Accuracy and Penetration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current arrowhead point blades are typically wider than the arrowhead body, reducing kinetic energy and are prone to damage upon impact, leading to reduced accuracy and penetration.

Innovation Solution

An arrowhead point blade configuration featuring a first and second blade with an interference fit, where the first blade is partially aligned with the second blade, creating a self-centering mechanism that maintains kinetic energy and reduces runout during flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If current point blades are made wider than the arrowhead body, then cutting capability is improved, but kinetic energy is reduced and accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting capabilityVSAvoidkinetic energy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The point blade is divided into multiple segments (first point blade and second point blade) that can be independently positioned and centered. This segmentation allows each blade segment to be optimized for cutting while maintaining a streamlined overall profile that reduces drag and preserves kinetic energy during flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first point blade is nested within or adjacent to the second point blade, with both blades positioned within the confines of the arrowhead body. This nested arrangement allows the blades to provide cutting capability while maintaining a compact profile that does not exceed the arrowhead body width, thereby preserving kinetic energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Strength

If point blades are made wider than the arrowhead body, then cutting performance is enhanced, but aerodynamic drag increases reducing flight accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidflight accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The point blade structure implements local quality by concentrating cutting functionality at the tip region where the blades are positioned, while the main body of the arrowhead maintains a streamlined, narrow profile for optimal aerodynamics. The self-centering mechanism ensures proper alignment of these local cutting elements without compromising overall flight stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The self-centering mechanism introduces dynamic adjustment capability that allows the point blades to automatically align themselves during flight. This dynamic self-centering ensures optimal blade positioning relative to the arrow shaft, maintaining flight accuracy while preserving cutting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If point blades are positioned at the end of the arrowhead, then initial contact with target is achieved, but blade damage occurs reducing penetration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial contact speedVSAvoidpenetration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The self-centering mechanism and interference fit arrangement provide beforehand cushioning by ensuring proper blade alignment and positioning before target impact. This pre-alignment prevents blade deflection or damage upon initial contact, preserving penetration capability. The structured support from the arrowhead body also provides mechanical cushioning against impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20260022921A1Self-Centering Arrowhead Point Blade Configuration
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 STEELMAN OUTDOORS UNLIMITED LLC
  • US20260022921A1 patent drawing
  • US20260022921A1 patent drawing
  • US20260022921A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed technology includes an arrowhead point blade configuration having a first point blade and a second point blade. The first blade may include a tip and a base. A coupling aperture may be defined within the first blade adjacent to the base. A slot may extend up from the coupling aperture towards the tip. The second blade may include a tip and a base. A coupling aperture may be defined within the second blade adjacent to the base. A slot may extend down from the tip and may be separate from the coupling aperture. The first blade slot may be positioned within the second blade slot, partially aligning the coupling apertures. The size and shape of the blade slots and coupling apertures may be such that a fastener inserted through the coupling apertures pulls the first blade downwards into the second blade creating an interference fit and centering the blades.