Self-centering Spring Return Mechanism for Appliance Knob

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional appliance knobs lack intuitive and ergonomic self-centering mechanisms, leading to suboptimal user experience and usability when adjusting parameters or functions.

Innovation Solution

A self-centering spring return mechanism for a knob assembly, comprising a back disk, rotary arms, a spring, and a circuit board with positioning data circuitry, which limits rotation and provides haptic feedback, enabling the knob to return to a central position after a 30-degree adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional mechanical detents are used to provide user feedback, then user feedback for knob positioning is achieved, but the mechanism lacks self-centering capability and intuitive operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitive operationVSAvoidmechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical detents with a spring-loaded cam mechanism that provides both positioning feedback and self-centering capability. The cam profile is designed to guide the knob through discrete positions while the spring provides the restoring force for self-centering, eliminating the need for complex mechanical detent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded mechanism automatically returns the knob to its centered position after rotation, providing self-centering functionality without requiring additional actuators or complex control systems. The user simply needs to rotate the knob, and the spring-cam system handles the return motion autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the knob allows free rotation for parameter adjustment, then ease of adjustment is improved, but precise positioning and limiting rotation to specific ranges becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknob positioning precisionVSAvoidrotation freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cam profile is designed with varying resistance zones that guide the user through specific rotation ranges. The cam provides natural stopping points at predetermined angles (e.g., 30-degree increments) while allowing smooth rotation between these points. The spring force dynamically adjusts during rotation to provide tactile feedback at position transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cam mechanism creates periodic tactile feedback during rotation, with distinct resistance changes at specific angular intervals. This periodic resistance pattern guides the user through discrete positioning steps while maintaining overall rotational freedom, ensuring the knob stops at precise intervals without restricting the adjustment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of information

If mechanical detents are used for positioning feedback, then user feedback is provided, but the system lacks haptic feedback and intuitive tactile cues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning feedbackVSAvoidfeedback mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded cam mechanism provides tactile feedback through variable resistance during rotation. As the user rotates the knob, the cam profile creates noticeable changes in rotational resistance at position transitions, giving intuitive haptic cues about current and target positions. This mechanical feedback system eliminates the need for electronic sensors or displays for basic positioning information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances usability and user-friendliness by allowing intuitive control and precise positioning of appliance parameters or functions, improving the overall user experience through ergonomic design and feedback mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a spring defining opposing arms, each arm of which engages and opposes rotation of a respective rotary arm of the pair of rotary arms in a respective direction of opposing clockwise and counter-clockwise directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the spring drives the one of the pair of rotary arms in the clockwise direction opposing the respective direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10466736B2Self-centering spring return mechanism for an appliance knob
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 ELECTROLUX CONSUMER PROD INC
  • US10466736B2 patent drawing
  • US10466736B2 patent drawing
  • US10466736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-centering knob assembly comprising a back disk, a pair of rotary arms, a spring, and a circuit board fixed to the knob shaft, is provided, with the pair of rotary arms and spring disposed between the back disk and circuit board. Each rotary arm defines first and second slots at opposing ends and a center aperture therebetween that rotatably engages the knob shaft. The first slot engages the end stop pin to limit rotation of the rotary arm. The spring defines opposing arms that engage and oppose rotation of respective rotary arms of the pair. The circuit board includes circuitry configured to provide positioning data of the knob shaft, and including a drive pin that, for each rotary arm, engages and carries the second slot in a respective direction of an opposing direction when the knob shaft and thereby the circuit board is rotated in the respective direction.