Self-Configuring Wireless Network Nodes Using Propagation Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless network systems require extensive pre-engineering and manual configuration, making them inflexible and costly, unable to adapt to changing environmental conditions or optimize performance across all nodes, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A self-configuring wireless network system that uses real-time environmental data and propagation modeling to dynamically adjust RF operational parameters across all nodes, enabling automatic and iterative optimization of network performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual configuration and extensive pre-engineering work are performed, then network deployment accuracy can be ensured, but deployment time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork deployment accuracyVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary propagation modeling and environmental analysis automatically during the deployment process itself, rather than requiring extensive pre-engineering work. The computing device obtains propagation models and environmental data, then automatically determines optimal operating parameters as nodes are deployed, eliminating the need for lengthy manual design processes while ensuring accurate deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The wireless network nodes automatically configure themselves by receiving optimal operating parameters from the computing device based on real-time environmental data and propagation modeling. Each node self-adjusts its RF parameters without requiring manual configuration by technicians, thereby reducing deployment time while maintaining deployment accuracy through automated optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If manual configuration is used with limited user interface options, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing environmental conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration interface complexityVSAvoidadaptability to environmental changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors environmental conditions and network performance, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust operating parameters across the network. The computing device receives environmental data, re-evaluates propagation models, and redistributes optimized parameters to nodes, enabling the network to adapt to changing conditions without requiring complex manual reconfiguration interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes RF operating parameters (such as power levels, frequencies, and modulation schemes) based on real-time environmental conditions and propagation modeling results. This automated parameter optimization allows the network to adapt to environmental changes while keeping the user interface simple, as the system handles complexity through automated parameter adjustment rather than user-friendly configuration options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If automated configuration mechanisms are implemented with local inputs only, then ease of operation is improved, but overall network performance deteriorates due to lack of system-wide optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidoverall network performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges local environmental data with system-wide propagation models and network performance information to determine optimal parameters for each node. The computing device collects data from multiple sources including distant network nodes, combines this information with local measurements, and generates coordinated parameter sets that optimize overall network performance while maintaining automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The computing device performs multiple functions: it acts as a central coordinator collecting environmental data from all nodes, runs propagation models for the entire network, analyzes system-wide performance metrics, and distributes optimized parameters back to individual nodes. This multi-functional approach enables automated operation while ensuring system-wide optimization, as the same device that simplifies node configuration also guarantees network-wide performance through centralized coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11777805B2Self-configuring wireless networks
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 CACI INC FEDERAL
  • US11777805B2 patent drawing
  • US11777805B2 patent drawing
  • US11777805B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure pertains to a self-configuring network comprising one or more nodes each configured to provide wireless coverage to one or more transceivers. Some embodiments may: obtain a wireless propagation model, including environmental data; determine, via a computing device of the network, a set of optimal operating parameters using the obtained model and the environmental data; and configure, via the computing device, at least one of the one or more nodes with the set of optimal operating parameters. As a result, overall system performance on the larger macro scale may be maximized. That is, improving performance of only one or a few devices, on a micro-scale, may not be sufficient, as this may be achieved at the expense of harming performance of other devices.