Self-damping End Effector Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

End effectors used in substrate handling systems for semiconductor and solar cell fabrication experience significant vibration due to acceleration forces, leading to unintended substrate shifting and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of self-damping end effectors with integrated dampers that match the natural frequency of the fingers, reducing vibration amplitudes and allowing for higher operational speeds without increasing size or weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the acceleration of an end effector is reduced to mitigate vibration, then substrate shifting is reduced, but throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate positioning accuracyVSAvoidsubstrate throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanical vibration principles by attaching dampers with natural frequencies matched to the finger's natural frequency. This creates controlled vibrational interaction that dissipates unwanted vibration energy, allowing the end effector to maintain higher acceleration while minimizing substrate shifting through resonant damping of the finger vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the finger structure by attaching dampers with specific mass and natural frequency characteristics. By carefully selecting the damper parameters (mass, stiffness, natural frequency) to match the finger's natural frequency, the system transforms the vibration problem into a controlled parameter relationship that enables both high acceleration and low substrate shifting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If dampers are added to reduce vibration, then substrate shifting is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate positioning accuracyVSAvoidend effector structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by attaching dampers only to specific locations on the fingers where vibration occurs, rather than redesigning the entire end effector structure. Each damper is locally positioned on individual fingers that experience vibration, creating a targeted solution that minimizes overall structural complexity while effectively addressing the vibration problem at its source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure by combining the original finger material with damper materials having different mechanical properties. This composite approach allows the finger-damper assembly to exhibit both the structural integrity needed for substrate support and the vibrational damping characteristics needed to reduce substrate shifting, without requiring a complete redesign of the finger structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If dampers are added to reduce vibration, then substrate shifting is reduced, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate positioning accuracyVSAvoidend effector weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by attaching dampers only to the specific fingers that experience vibration during operation, rather than adding weight to the entire end effector structure. This selective approach provides vibration damping where needed while minimizing unnecessary weight addition, as only the affected fingers receive damper attachments proportional to their vibrational exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The self-damping end effectors effectively mitigate substrate shifting and enable faster substrate handling, improving throughput by reducing vibrational amplitudes and maintaining operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the damper having a natural frequency within a predetermined tolerance of a natural frequency of the finger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

a damper associated with the finger, the damper having a natural frequency within a predetermined tolerance of a natural frequency of the finger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9862101B2Self-damping end effector
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 VARIAN SEMICON EQUIP ASSC INC
  • US9862101B2 patent drawing
  • US9862101B2 patent drawing
  • US9862101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-damping end effector including a base, a finger extending from the base and adapted to support a substrate, and a damper associated with the finger, the damper having a natural frequency within a predetermined tolerance of a natural frequency of the finger.