Self-Decommissioning Program for Automated Resource Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale computer systems become inefficient and costly to maintain due to the lack of emphasis on decommissioning and re-commissioning of unused or underutilized components and programs, often requiring manual authorization and lacking self-decommissioning capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A self-decommissioning program integrated into the computer system that measures predefined metrics and applies logic criteria to automatically decommission or re-commission components and programs, allowing for automated decision-making and notification of personnel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual authorization and monitoring are used for decommissioning components, then human control and authorization are maintained, but system efficiency decreases and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidmanual management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-monitoring of component usage metrics and automatically executes decommissioning decisions without requiring continuous manual authorization. The monitoring program tracks usage data, compares it against predefined thresholds, and triggers automated decommissioning actions, enabling the system to manage itself and eliminating the need for ongoing manual intervention while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors component usage metrics and uses this feedback to automatically adjust the decommissioning state of components. When usage falls below predefined thresholds for a specified period, the system receives feedback that triggers automated decommissioning. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the system adapts to changing conditions and maintains optimal resource allocation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If components are continuously monitored and automatically decommissioned, then maintenance costs and hardware capacity needs are reduced, but automated decision-making complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costsVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes usage thresholds, monitoring parameters, and decommissioning logic before components are deployed or before usage patterns change. This preliminary configuration of automation rules eliminates the need for complex real-time decision-making algorithms, reducing automated decision-making complexity while enabling continuous cost optimization through automatic decommissioning of underutilized resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts operational parameters such as component usage thresholds, monitoring frequencies, and decommissioning timing based on predefined conditions. By changing parameters dynamically rather than requiring complex adaptive algorithms, the system reduces automation complexity while achieving significant maintenance cost reductions through efficient resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If emphasis is placed on deployment of new applications and resources, then system functionality and capacity increase, but efficiency decreases due to accumulation of unused components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors component usage and maintains ongoing decommissioning actions without interruption. This continuous operation ensures that unused components are promptly removed, preventing the accumulation that would reduce efficiency. The continuous monitoring and automated decommissioning create a sustainable cycle that maintains system efficiency while allowing continuous deployment of new functional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically discards (decommissons) components that fall below usage thresholds and recovers resources they occupied. This enables the system to maintain high functionality by continuously replacing underutilized components with newly deployed ones, ensuring optimal resource allocation and efficiency while supporting ongoing system evolution and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS8997051B2Apparatus and method for decommissioning/recommissioning a component/program of a computer system
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US8997051B2 patent drawing
  • US8997051B2 patent drawing
  • US8997051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A program stored on a computer-readable medium for self-decommissioning at least a part of a program product is disclosed. The program may include a program code that defines a plurality of functions, a program code that includes a metric for each of the plurality of functions, wherein the metric includes at least a usage pattern and transactions relating to the metric, a program code configured to measure at least one metric, a program code defining a logic relating to the self-decommissioning of a component and/or program, a program code configured to determine decommissioning of the at least a part of the program product based on the logic, and a program code configured to self-decommission the at least a part of the program.