Self-Destructing Message Security via Time-Based Deletion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication technologies lack secure methods for transmitting highly confidential messages, making them susceptible to unauthorized access and leakage.

Innovation Solution

The development of methods, systems, and machine-readable programs that enable secure communication of self-destructive messages by categorizing messages based on security levels, using appropriate encryption protocols, and ensuring message destruction after a predetermined interval or upon reading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If messages are stored on the device until manually deleted, then users can access and read messages at their convenience, but the messages become susceptible to unauthorized access and leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMessage accessibilityVSAvoidMessage security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically deleting messages after a predetermined time interval without requiring manual deletion. This pre-programmed time-based destruction mechanism ensures that messages are removed from the device before potential unauthorized access can occur, resolving the contradiction between maintaining accessibility and ensuring security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The message system serves itself by automatically managing its own destruction timeline. The system tracks when messages were sent and automatically deletes them after the predetermined interval expires, eliminating the need for user intervention while maintaining both accessibility during the interval and security afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple security protocols are implemented for different message categories, then message security is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMessage securityVSAvoidSecurity protocol management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing different security protocols tailored to specific message categories. Each message type (e.g., confidential, internal, public) receives the appropriate level of security treatment, allowing the system to maintain high security for sensitive messages while using simpler protocols for less sensitive communications, thus managing complexity through differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by changing the security protocol parameter based on message category. Instead of implementing all possible security protocols simultaneously, the system dynamically selects and applies the appropriate protocol level based on the message sensitivity, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If messages are encrypted according to sensitivity level, then unauthorized access is prevented, but the complexity of message transmission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccess controlVSAvoidEncryption process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The encryption system applies local quality by implementing encryption only where necessary based on message sensitivity levels. High-sensitivity messages receive strong encryption, while low-sensitivity messages use simpler or no encryption, allowing the system to maintain access control for critical messages without unnecessarily complicating the transmission process for all messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial encryption action by encrypting only the portion of messages that require security protection. This selective approach ensures that encryption complexity is applied only to high-sensitivity messages rather than all messages, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining security where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If self-destructive messages are transmitted with time intervals, then message confidentiality is maintained, but the duration for which messages are available for reading is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMessage confidentialityVSAvoidMessage availability time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by setting a predetermined time interval for message availability before transmission. This pre-established timeline ensures that messages are automatically deleted after the specified duration, maintaining confidentiality while providing sufficient reading time for authorized users during the interval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to track when messages are read and automatically deletes them after the predetermined interval expires. This feedback-based timing system ensures that messages remain available only for the necessary duration and then self-destruct, balancing confidentiality with adequate access time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250068760A1Methods, systems and machine-readable programs for communicating self destructive messages
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 BOARDPAC PTE LTD
  • US20250068760A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068760A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068760A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods, systems and machine-readable programs for enabling a secure channel for communicating self-destructive messages. In an embodiment, a method, system and machine-readable program are provided for generating, communicating and receiving the self-destructive message is disclosed.