Self-Drilling Fastener Geometry for Drill Time and Pullout Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for self-drilling self-tapping fasteners that improve drilling time and pullout force without compromising ductility, tapping torque, torsional strength, or tensile strength.

Innovation Solution

The self-drilling self-tapping fastener features a head, shank, and helical thread formation with a drill tip and flutes, including chip breakers, formed from low carbon steel with a hardened surface for improved drilling and tapping capabilities, maintaining ductility and strength through specific design and manufacturing processes like forging and milling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the fastener uses conventional drilling and tapping operations, then the process is simple, but the drilling time is excessive and pullout force is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling timeVSAvoiddrilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines drilling and tapping operations into a single self-drilling self-tapping fastener that performs both functions simultaneously. The fastener features a drill tip for drilling and helical thread formation for tapping, eliminating the need for separate operations and significantly reducing drilling time while improving pullout force through integrated thread engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fastener is designed to perform drilling and tapping operations autonomously without requiring separate tools or operations. The self-drilling self-tapping mechanism allows the fastener to create its own hole and form threads simultaneously, reducing process complexity and time while maintaining structural integrity and pullout strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If the fastener uses hardened surface treatment, then drilling and tapping capabilities are improved, but ductility may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling and tapping capabilitiesVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener applies hardened surface treatment selectively to specific areas that require enhanced drilling and tapping capabilities, while maintaining the base material's ductility in other regions. This localized hardening approach allows the surface to resist wear and deformation during operation while the core material retains its formability and toughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fastener utilizes a composite structure combining a ductile base material with a hardened surface layer. This composite approach allows the core material to provide formability and toughness while the hardened surface provides enhanced drilling and tapping capabilities, resolving the contradiction between strength and ductility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Force

If the fastener increases thread engagement for higher pullout force, then pullout force improves, but drilling torque requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepullout forceVSAvoiddrilling torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener employs dynamic thread formation that adapts to the drilling process. The helical thread formation is designed to progressively engage the material as the fastener advances, optimizing the balance between pullout force and drilling torque. The thread geometry and engagement depth are dynamically adjusted during the self-drilling self-tapping process to minimize energy requirements while maximizing pullout strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design results in a faster drilling time and higher pullout force while maintaining or improving other performance metrics like ductility, tapping torque, and tensile strength compared to commercially available fasteners.

Implementation Method 1

The drill tip includes a first cutting blade having a first cutting edge and a second cutting blade having a second cutting edge. The first cutting edge and the second cutting edge are tapered toward each other.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical cutting: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

formed from low carbon steel with a hardened surface for improved drilling and tapping capabilities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface hardening: Case Hardening

Implementation Method 3

a helical thread formation outwardly extending from the shank for frictionally engaging the objects into which the fastener is driven

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

The second shank portion defines a longitudinally extending first flute and a longitudinally extending second flute. The second shank portion includes a first chip breaker positioned in the first flute and a second chip breaker positioned in the second flute.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical chip evacuation: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS20240301906A1Self-drilling self-tapping fastener
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20240301906A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301906A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-drilling self-tapping fastener that provides improved performance in both drilling time and pullout force without decreasing performance in any of ductility, tapping torque, torsional strength, and tension strength.