Self-Driving Car Lane Path Scoring for Fewer Lane Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current self-driving car technologies face challenges in planning and executing routes efficiently, particularly in minimizing lane-changing maneuvers, which can be complex due to numerous lane-level alternatives and dynamic traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a combination of global and local scoring models to evaluate and adjust lane transitions, incorporating traffic rules and real-time data from sensors to determine the most desirable lane paths, thereby reducing the number of lane changes and optimizing route planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system evaluates all lane-level alternatives to find the optimal route, then route planning accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute planning accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the route planning process into two distinct stages: global route planning that identifies the overall path from origin to destination, and local lane-level planning that optimizes specific lane transitions along that path. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate lane-level alternatives only where necessary, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining routing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary global route planning to establish the overall path before conducting detailed local lane-level evaluation. By pre-determining the general route and identifying only those segments requiring lane changes, the system reduces the scope of complex evaluations to specific critical areas, thereby managing computational load effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the system performs frequent lane-changing maneuvers to optimize route efficiency, then travel time is reduced, but safety and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute efficiencyVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic lane change evaluation system that continuously assesses current traffic conditions, sensor data, and environmental factors before recommending lane transitions. The system adapts its lane-changing strategy in real-time, performing maneuvers only when conditions are favorable and safe, thus balancing route efficiency with operational safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback from sensors and traffic conditions to evaluate the safety and desirability of potential lane changes. By continuously monitoring the environment and adjusting lane transition decisions based on current conditions, the system ensures that lane changes are performed only when they improve efficiency without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the system uses a single comprehensive scoring model to evaluate all lane transitions, then evaluation consistency is improved, but adaptability to local conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation consistencyVSAvoidadaptability to local conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs different scoring models for different stages of route planning: a global scoring model that applies consistent criteria across the entire route, and local scoring models that adapt to specific local conditions at each lane transition point. This allows the system to maintain overall evaluation consistency while adapting to local traffic patterns, road geometry, and environmental factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is segmented into global and local components. The global scoring model provides consistent baseline evaluation across the entire route, while local scoring models are applied specifically to lane transition segments, allowing adaptability to local conditions without compromising overall evaluation consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11796335B2Method of and system for controlling operation of self-driving car
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 Y E HUB ARMENIA LLC
  • US11796335B2 patent drawing
  • US11796335B2 patent drawing
  • US11796335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and device for controlling operation of a Self-Driving Car. The method includes determining route-level and lane-level information for generating a graph-structure, applying a first model for assigning costs to respective edges, determining scores for vertices based on the costs, storing the edges with the costs and the vertices with the scores. The method also includes at a given moment in time during operation: acquiring a lane path indicative of a lane segment extending from the current location without a lane-changing manoeuvre. The method includes, for the lane path: identifying a series of vertices covered by the lane segment, applying a second model for assigning additional costs to lane-path-departing edges of the series of vertices thereby determining locally-increased costs, determining a locally-adjusted scores for vertices in the series of vertices based on the locally-increased costs, and identifying a lane path score for the lane path based on the locally-adjusted scores.