Self-Healing Anti-Leak Coating for Liquid Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective barrier coatings for liquid containers, such as fuel tanks, are not optimally tailored to address specific anti-leakage protection needs, as they often rely on fixed materials and layer thicknesses, limiting their effectiveness in various liquid containment scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A three-layer protective coating system where each layer's structure and composition can be optimized using a range of elastomeric materials and liquid-imbiber beads, allowing for tailored responses to penetration wounds, with the option to use different elastomeric materials in each layer and varying bead populations to enhance leakage control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed materials and layer thicknesses are used in protective barrier coatings, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different liquid containment scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different liquid containment scenariosVSAvoidcoating structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coating is divided into three distinct layers with different functions: a first layer for elastomeric response, a second layer with liquid-imbiber beads for liquid absorption, and a third layer for additional protection. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized independently for specific liquid containment scenarios while maintaining overall coating effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coating structure is made dynamic by allowing selection of different elastomeric materials and varying thicknesses for each of the three layers based on the specific liquid containment requirements. This enables the coating to be tailored for different scenarios such as fuel tanks versus chemical containers, providing adaptability without requiring a completely different coating system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a single elastomeric material is used throughout all layers, then material consistency is maintained, but performance optimization for specific scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-leakage effectivenessVSAvoidmaterial selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different elastomeric materials can be selected for each of the three layers based on the specific requirements of the liquid containment scenario. For example, the first layer might use a material optimized for initial wound closure while the third layer uses a material optimized for long-term durability. This local quality approach allows performance optimization without requiring the same material throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The coating employs composite construction with potentially different elastomeric materials in each layer, combined with liquid-imbiber beads in the second layer. This composite approach enables the coating to leverage the strengths of different materials for different functions, improving overall reliability for specific anti-leakage scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If uniform layer thicknesses are applied, then application simplicity is maintained, but performance optimization for different penetration wound responses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating application easeVSAvoidlayer thickness precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The thickness of each of the three layers can be varied as a key parameter to optimize performance for different liquid containment scenarios. For instance, the second layer with liquid-imbiber beads might be made thicker for scenarios involving high-volume liquid leakage, while the first and third layers are adjusted for their respective functions. This parameter flexibility maintains ease of application while achieving manufacturing precision where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized three-layer coating effectively prevents liquid leakage from penetration wounds by providing customized elastomeric and liquid-imbibing responses, improving anti-leakage protection across different liquid containment situations.

Implementation Method 1

This material responds to a puncture wound both with an elastomeric, resilience-memory response

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastomeric memory response: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a distribution of dedicated liquid-imbiber beads that are embedded in this elastomeric body to furnish significant liquid-imbibing, and three-dimensional material swelling and coagulating, responses as a consequence of contact with any liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid imbibing: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS7220455B2Material-selectable, self-healing, anti-leak method for coating liquid container
Publication Date: 2007.05.22 HIGH IMPACT TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US7220455B2 patent drawing
  • US7220455B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for applying a plural-layer coating to the outside of a liquid container to act as an anti-leakage barrier in the event of a penetration wound occurring in the container resulting from a penetrating projectile strike, such as a bullet strike. This method includes (a) forming on the outside of such a container, a first layer optimized for providing an elastomeric wound-closure response, (b) forming on the outside of this first layer a second layer optimized for providing combined elastomeric and liquid-imbibing wound-closure responses, and (c) forming on the outside of such a second layer a third, layer optimized in the same manner as the first layer.