Self Healing File System Per-Block Metadata Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current file server technologies lack effective mechanisms for proactive detection and containment of faults, errors, and corruptions, leading to difficulties in ensuring fast and reliable access to vast amounts of stored information and increasing the cost of administration, data backup, and information lifecycle management.

Innovation Solution

A file server system that maintains per-block metadata for each file system block, including redundancy checks, inode identifiers, and offsets, to detect errors and facilitate non-intrusive recovery, using a container file system architecture with a sparse metavolume for enhanced fault detection and containment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional file server technologies are used without per-block metadata and redundancy checks, then the system structure remains simple and administration costs are lower, but the system cannot proactively detect and contain faults, leading to service disruption and data loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection and containment capabilityVSAvoidfile system structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The file system is segmented into multiple components: file system blocks, per-block metadata structures, and redundancy check mechanisms. Each file system block is associated with its own metadata containing redundancy checks, allowing independent verification and containment of faults at the block level without affecting the entire file system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Redundancy checks are pre-computed and stored in the per-block metadata before actual data access occurs. This preliminary action enables proactive detection of corruptions and errors before they can propagate or cause service disruption, allowing the system to detect and contain faults in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If file system checks are performed using conventional methods, then the entire storage system must be taken offline for consistency verification, but this ensures comprehensive error detection and recovery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrity verificationVSAvoidclient access availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into individual block-level operations using per-block metadata. Each block can be verified independently through its redundancy checks without requiring the entire file system to be taken offline. This allows continuous client access to unaffected portions of the storage system while verification proceeds on specific blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The per-block metadata acts as an intermediary structure that enables verification without direct intervention in the main data flow. The redundancy checks stored in metadata provide a mediation layer that allows error detection to occur in the background without disrupting client access to the actual data blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If the storage system uses vast amounts of data without per-block error detection, then storage capacity is maximized, but the cost of data administration, backup, and lifecycle management increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidadministration and management time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Error detection capabilities are built into the storage structure itself through per-block metadata with redundancy checks. This preliminary embedding of verification mechanisms eliminates the need for separate, time-consuming administration and verification processes, allowing the storage system to scale in capacity without proportionally increasing management overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The file system performs self-verification through the redundancy checks embedded in its own metadata structure. Each block contains its own error detection information, allowing the system to autonomously detect and contain faults without requiring external administration or manual intervention, thereby reducing the time and resources needed for data management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7694191B1Self healing file system
Publication Date: 2010.04.06 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US7694191B1 patent drawing
  • US7694191B1 patent drawing
  • US7694191B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A self healing file system is designed for proactive detection and containment of faults, errors, and corruptions, in order to enable in place (online) and non-intrusive recovery. For proactive fault detection, the file system maintains certain per-block metadata of each file system block. The per-block metadata includes a redundancy check, and for file system data blocks, an inode identifier, and an offset of the file system data block in the file including the file system data block. The redundancy check is used to detect and mark bad file system blocks. The inode identifier and offset is used for validating connectivity of the file system blocks to the inodes, and for tracing bad blocks to files that contain the bad blocks.