Self-Healing Metadata Accuracy via Probabilistic Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inaccurate metadata in media hosting services due to software, hardware, or network issues is difficult to identify and correct, especially in systems with large amounts of metadata, leading to inefficiencies in maintaining accurate system status and user information.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a probability server and a verification server that determines the accuracy of summary metadata by calculating a probability of inaccuracy based on entity activity and comparing it to a threshold, with the verification server updating summary metadata to correct values derived from master metadata when inaccuracies are found.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all metadata is reviewed to determine inaccuracy, then metadata accuracy can be ensured, but system efficiency deteriorates due to the large volume of metadata

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata accuracyVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the metadata verification process by dividing metadata into different types (summary metadata and detailed metadata) and applying different verification strategies to each. Summary metadata is verified using probabilistic sampling while detailed metadata is verified on-demand, thereby resolving the contradiction between ensuring accuracy and maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial verification action by using probabilistic sampling to verify only a subset of summary metadata rather than all metadata. The system calculates accuracy probabilities and selectively verifies metadata based on risk thresholds, achieving acceptable accuracy levels without the overhead of complete verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If metadata verification is performed frequently, then metadata accuracy is improved, but system resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata accuracyVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic verification action by scheduling metadata accuracy checks at intervals rather than continuously. The system monitors accuracy probabilities over time and triggers verification only when thresholds are exceeded or at scheduled intervals, reducing resource consumption while maintaining acceptable accuracy levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the verification parameter from binary (verify/don't verify) to probabilistic (accuracy probability). By calculating and monitoring accuracy probabilities, the system can make informed decisions about when verification is necessary, optimizing resource usage based on actual risk levels rather than fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If probabilistic verification is used instead of complete verification, then system efficiency is improved, but measurement precision of metadata accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy determination precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where verification results are used to update accuracy probabilities for future decisions. When metadata is verified, the actual accuracy outcome feeds back into the system to refine probability calculations, improving the precision of probabilistic predictions over time while maintaining efficiency benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary probabilistic assessment before committing to full verification. By calculating accuracy probabilities in advance, the system can identify high-risk metadata that requires precise verification while avoiding unnecessary verification of low-risk items, thus balancing precision requirements with efficiency constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10108656B1Self healing system for inaccurate metadata
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10108656B1 patent drawing
  • US10108656B1 patent drawing
  • US10108656B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Based on a probability of summary metadata associated with an entity of a media hosting service being inaccurate, a determination is made as to whether to verify the accuracy of the summary metadata. In response to determining to verify the accuracy of the summary metadata, a determination is made as to whether the summary metadata is inaccurate with respect to master metadata associated with the entity of the media hosting service. The summary metadata is updated with a correct value determined from the master metadata, in response to determining the summary metadata is inaccurate.