Self-Injection Locked Oscillator for Low-Power Phase Noise Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing oscillator circuits face challenges in generating low-power, low-phase noise clock signals, particularly at high frequencies, as they are often power-hungry and sensitive to temperature and vibration, and traditional methods like quartz crystal oscillators or MEMS oscillators are either too large or inefficient for on-chip integration.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves using a self-injection locking technique where an oscillator's output is filtered through high-Q bandpass filters to produce harmonics, which are then multiplied and filtered to create a beat frequency waveform, injected back into the oscillator to achieve low-phase noise operation, allowing for compact, low-power, and stable clock signal generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quartz crystal oscillators are used for frequency generation, then phase noise is reduced and frequency stability is improved, but device size increases and frequency range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency stabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical resonators (quartz crystals, MEMS) with an electronic oscillator circuit that uses electromagnetic resonance. The LC oscillator circuit with inductor and capacitor substitutes the mechanical vibration-based frequency generation, enabling integration on semiconductor chips while maintaining frequency stability through electronic resonance mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential frequency generation function from complex mechanical oscillator systems and implements it through a simplified electronic oscillator circuit. By removing the mechanical resonator component and using purely electronic elements (transistors, inductors, capacitors), the design achieves frequency generation without the size and integration limitations of mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If MEMS oscillators are used for frequency generation, then integration is improved, but device area increases at low frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoiddevice area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces MEMS mechanical resonators with an electronic oscillator circuit that generates frequency through electromagnetic resonance. This substitution eliminates the need for large mechanical structures at low frequencies, enabling compact integration while maintaining the ability to generate low-frequency signals through electronic rather than mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If divider circuits are used with oscillators, then frequency multiplication is achieved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency outputVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs frequency multiplication in advance during the oscillation generation process itself, rather than using separate divider circuits afterward. The oscillator circuit is designed to directly produce the desired output frequency through its resonance characteristics, eliminating the need for additional frequency conversion stages and their associated power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Speed

If traditional oscillators are used for clock generation, then frequency output is achieved, but phase noise remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency outputVSAvoidphase noise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms within the oscillator circuit to reduce phase noise. The output signal is fed back to the input through carefully designed feedback paths that reinforce the fundamental frequency while suppressing noise components. This feedback control stabilizes the oscillation and reduces phase jitter, achieving low phase noise without sacrificing frequency output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes circuit parameters such as Q-factor, resonance frequency, and component values to minimize phase noise. By carefully selecting and tuning the inductor and capacitor values, as well as the transistor biasing conditions, the oscillator achieves optimal phase noise performance while maintaining the desired frequency output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces phase noise in the oscillator output, achieving a stable and low-power clock signal suitable for on-chip integration, with improved resilience against absolute drift and temperature variations, and decouples unity loop-gain from phase noise performance.

Implementation Method 1

filtering said signal through one or more bandpass filters comprising at least two resonators, said filters having Q factor ≥5, said filters configured to pass said Mth and Pth harmonic components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

multiplying said filtered Mth and Pth harmonic components together to produce a multiplied signal, and filtering said multiplied signal using a low pass filter to pass a difference between said filtered Mth and Pth harmonic components, said difference comprising a filtered beat frequency waveform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency mixing: Heterodyne

Implementation Method 3

injecting said filtered beat frequency waveform into said oscillator to thereby injection lock said signal to said filtered beat frequency waveform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjection locking:

Data Source

PatentUS10541697B2Self-injection locking for low-power low-phase noise oscillators
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10541697B2 patent drawing
  • US10541697B2 patent drawing
  • US10541697B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For producing a low-power, low-phase noise oscillating signal using a self-injection locking oscillator, examples include: producing, using an oscillator, a signal having a base frequency component and an Nth harmonic component, in which N is a selected integer and N>1; filtering the signal through a bandpass filter with Q factor ≥5, the filter configured to pass the Nth harmonic component as a filtered Nth harmonic component; and injecting the filtered Nth harmonic component into the oscillator to self-injection lock the base frequency of the signal.