Self-Interference Canceller Tuning for Full-Duplex Drift Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Full-duplex wireless communication systems face challenges due to self-interference, as they are not easily adaptable to changing interference characteristics and component drifts, limiting their effectiveness in maintaining high self-interference cancellation performance over time.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for dynamic tuning of self-interference cancellers, incorporating a tuning circuit that controls parameters of both analog and digital self-interference cancellers, allowing for simultaneous and parallel cancellation of interference, using digital and analog circuitry with programmable components to adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If full-duplex wireless communication systems are implemented to enable simultaneous transmission and reception, then spectral efficiency is improved, but self-interference occurs that degrades system performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidself-interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The self-interference cancellation process is segmented into multiple stages: analog cancellation in the RF domain, digital cancellation in the baseband domain, and iterative refinement. Each stage handles specific portions of the interference, dividing the complex cancellation task into manageable segments that can be processed independently and sequentially

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Analog self-interference cancellers are introduced as intermediary components that generate cancellation signals in the RF domain before the signal enters the receiver chain. These cancellers act as mediators by creating artificial signals that counteract the self-interference, allowing the receiver to process the desired signal more effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If static self-interference cancellation is used, then system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to changing interference characteristics and component drifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadaptability to changing interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static cancellation parameters to dynamic, time-varying cancellation parameters. The analog self-interference cancellers incorporate tunable components such as variable capacitors, inductors, or digitally controlled attenuators that can adjust their characteristics in real-time to track changing interference conditions and component drifts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback mechanism is implemented where the receiver monitors the residual self-interference after cancellation and feeds this information back to the analog self-interference cancellers. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically adjust cancellation parameters to maintain optimal performance despite changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If analog self-interference cancellation is used, then cancellation effectiveness is improved, but component drifts and changing conditions degrade performance over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancellation effectivenessVSAvoidstability against component drift
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs parameter changes in the analog self-interference cancellers, specifically in the transfer functions of the filter banks and modulation/demodulation parameters. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on current operating conditions, the system maintains cancellation effectiveness despite component drifts and environmental changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9698860B2Systems and methods for self-interference canceller tuning
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 QUALCOMM INC
  • US9698860B2 patent drawing
  • US9698860B2 patent drawing
  • US9698860B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for tuning an analog self-interference canceller includes detecting a tuning trigger, calculating a set of tuning parameters (the tuning parameters including complex weights for a set of taps of the analog self-interference canceller) in response to the tuning trigger, and applying the set of tuning parameters based on component calibration data.