Self-Learning Input Filter for Adaptive Medical Alarm Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices suffer from rigidly programmed alarm thresholds that lead to false alarms and desensitization of clinical staff, increasing the risk of patient safety hazards due to alarm fatigue and workload.

Innovation Solution

A self-learning system using a Bayes filter to dynamically adjust alarm thresholds based on historical input data, calculating error probabilities to reduce false alarms and adapt to changing situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rigid alarm thresholds are programmed into the medical device, then the device can operate with simple and reliable alarm monitoring, but it produces false alarms and cannot adapt to different patient situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of alarm thresholdsVSAvoidcomplexity of alarm monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm thresholds are transformed from static, pre-programmed values to dynamic values that automatically adapt based on real-time patient data and historical information. The system continuously adjusts thresholds according to the calculated error probability, enabling the device to respond to changing patient conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The medical device performs self-learning by automatically analyzing its own alarm history and patient data to adjust alarm thresholds. The system uses its internal resources (processor, memory, algorithms) to independently optimize alarm monitoring parameters without requiring external programming or manual calibration by clinicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If alarm thresholds are manually adjusted by clinic staff, then the thresholds can be adapted to specific patient needs, but this requires significant time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of alarm thresholdsVSAvoidtime for threshold adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs threshold adjustment using algorithms that analyze patient data and alarm history. This eliminates the need for clinicians to manually program thresholds, freeing up their time for direct patient care while maintaining personalized alarm monitoring for each patient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors alarm outcomes and patient responses, using this feedback to automatically refine and adjust alarm thresholds. This closed-loop approach enables the system to learn from actual clinical scenarios and optimize thresholds in real-time without requiring manual reprogramming by staff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If fixed alarm thresholds are used, then the system is simple to operate, but it leads to alarm fatigue and desensitization of clinical staff

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of alarm systemVSAvoidreliability of alarm response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm thresholds dynamically adapt to reduce false alarms while maintaining sensitivity to critical events. By automatically adjusting thresholds based on error probability calculations, the system maintains simplicity of operation while improving reliability of alarm responses, thereby reducing alarm fatigue and staff desensitization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the database is updated frequently with new patient data, then the alarm thresholds can adapt quickly to changing situations, but this increases computational load and processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of threshold adaptationVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial updates of the database and threshold calculations only when necessary, rather than continuously processing all available data. This selective updating approach enables quick adaptation to critical changes in patient condition while minimizing unnecessary computational energy consumption during stable periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12575793B2Self-learning input filter for medical devices
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 B BRAUN AVITUM
  • US12575793B2 patent drawing
  • US12575793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for monitoring the reliability of an input in a medical device in which at least one value is entered into the medical device, an occurrence probability density of the at least one value is calculated on the basis of an input history, an error probability of the input is calculated from an a priori error probability density stored in a first database and loaded from the first database and the calculated occurrence probability density, and the error probability is output for further handling of the input.