Self-Localizing Anchor Devices for Indoor Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current indoor localization systems for tracking personnel in emergency situations, such as building fires, are hindered by the need for costly and time-consuming installation of statically placed anchor devices, which limits their deployment and effectiveness due to the requirement for precise placement and maintenance, and are often rendered inoperable by power outages.

Innovation Solution

The development of self-localizing anchor devices that can be dynamically deployed and transition between operating states, allowing them to determine their position and serve as reference points for tags within a scene, reducing the need for static installation and enabling rapid setup of accurate indoor positioning systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If statically mounted anchor devices are precisely placed to enable accurate localization, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and installation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Anchor devices perform self-localization by determining their positions autonomously through wireless communication with other anchor devices, eliminating the need for manual precise placement and reducing installation complexity while maintaining localization accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static anchor device placement to dynamic self-localization where anchor devices can be freely deployed and automatically determine their positions, making the system adaptable to different environments without reinstallation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple candidate positions are calculated using different techniques, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates errors for each candidate position and uses this feedback to select the most accurate position, improving measurement precision through error-aware selection while managing computation time by evaluating multiple candidates efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If error estimation is performed for multiple candidate positions, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of position accuracy by estimating errors for multiple candidate positions and selecting the best one, improving measurement precision while managing energy consumption through selective error estimation rather than continuous high-precision calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11714158B2Position determination systems and methods utilizing error of multiple candidate positions
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 UNIV OF WASHINGTON
  • US11714158B2 patent drawing
  • US11714158B2 patent drawing
  • US11714158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of systems and methods described herein may be used to track a tagged object through a scene. Techniques are described herein to calculate a position of the tag using wireless communication with multiple anchor devices. In some examples, the anchor devices may be self-localizing, e.g., they may dynamically determine their position and relationship to one another. In some examples, position of a tag may be calculated by calculating multiple candidate positions using different localization techniques—such as geometric localization techniques and/or optimization-based techniques. An error may also be identified associated with each candidate position. A final position may be determined for the tag based on the errors associated with the candidate positions (e.g., the candidate position with the smallest error may be utilized as the position, e.g., the determined position, of the tag).