Self-Locating Controls via Capacitive Hand Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems fail to adapt effectively to the varying positions and orientations of users' hands, limiting contextualized and positional control access in real-world, virtual reality, and augmented reality settings.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of capacitive-based sensor systems that utilize frequency-orthogonal signaling and multiplexing techniques, such as FDM and CDM, to detect and process touch events with low latency, allowing for the recognition of hover, contact, and pressure without physical contact, and adapt controls based on hand position and orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional control systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the system cannot adapt to varying hand positions and orientations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to hand positionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed to perform multiple functions by detecting various hand positions, orientations, and gestures using capacitive sensors. A single sensor array can identify different hand placements, hovering distances, and rotational orientations, allowing one system to replace multiple dedicated controls for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical switches, buttons, and physical contact controls with capacitive sensing technology. This substitution enables detection of hand proximity, position, and orientation without physical contact, providing adaptability while maintaining system simplicity through electronic rather than mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If capacitive sensors with frequency-orthogonal signaling are implemented, then control precision and responsiveness are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch event detection precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is divided into multiple independent capacitive sensing elements arranged in arrays across the control surface. Each sensor element can be independently addressed and processed, allowing precise localization of hand position and orientation while enabling parallel processing that reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic frequency-orthogonal signaling to interrogate capacitive sensors, enabling multiplexed communication between multiple sensors and a central processor. This periodic signaling approach allows precise measurement of capacitance changes while reducing complexity through time-division multiplexing rather than requiring separate dedicated circuits for each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If hover detection is enabled, then contactless control is achieved, but false touch detection may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontactless control capabilityVSAvoidfalse touch detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements different detection thresholds and sensitivity levels for different regions of the control surface. Areas more prone to false hover detection can have adjusted parameters, while regions requiring precise contact detection maintain higher sensitivity. This localized tuning reduces false detections while preserving contactless control functionality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors capacitance changes and uses feedback mechanisms to distinguish between genuine hover gestures and false detections caused by environmental factors or incidental proximity. By analyzing the pattern, duration, and magnitude of capacitance changes over time, the system can filter false positives while maintaining responsive contactless control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables contextualized and positional control access regardless of hand position, providing efficient and accurate control events with low latency, enhancing user interaction in various environments and applications.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor system sensitive to hover, contact and pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of signals transmitted by the plurality of transmitting conductors are frequency orthogonal with respect to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency-orthogonal signaling:

Data Source

PatentUS11427279B2Self-locating controls
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 TACTUAL LABS CO
  • US11427279B2 patent drawing
  • US11427279B2 patent drawing
  • US11427279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor system is able adjust control location and the type of controls based on the positioning of a user's hands. The sensor system is adapted to detect the positioning of a hand or body part and compensate for the changing positions of the hand or body part. When the positioning of the hand or body part changes, the controls that are able to be activated by the hand or body part also change and adapt to the location where the controls are activated, providing accessible and/or contextualized controls.