Self-Locking Brake Pad Transmission for Non-Backdriving Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-backdriving rotation transmission mechanisms for robotic applications, such as myoelectric prostheses, suffer from low torque density, high mechanical play, limited maximum duty cycle, and high manufacturing tolerance requirements, leading to inefficiencies and premature wear.

Innovation Solution

A non-backdriving rotation transmission mechanism featuring two brake pads with articulation and a self-locking effect, integrated within a harmonic gearbox, which allows for high torque density, reduced mechanical play, and increased maximum duty cycle, while being easy to produce and assemble.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If worm gears or screw-nut mechanisms are used to achieve non-backdrivability, then non-backdriving capability is achieved, but efficiency becomes very low (less than 50%)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional friction-based mechanical mechanisms (worm gears, screw-nuts) with a magnetic field-based system. Magnets mounted on the output shaft interact with a stationary magnetic array to create a magnetic brake that prevents backdriving without mechanical contact, eliminating friction losses and achieving high transmission efficiency while maintaining non-backdriving capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If worm gears or screw-nut mechanisms are used, then non-backdrivability is achieved, but the maximum duty cycle is limited (10% at peak torque, 50% at nominal torque) due to overheating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidmaximum duty cycle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates mechanical friction interfaces by using a magnetic field-based braking system. The magnets on the output shaft create a magnetic brake that prevents backdriving without physical contact, eliminating heat generation from friction and allowing continuous operation at 100% duty cycle without overheating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If worm gears or screw-nut mechanisms are used, then non-backdrivability is achieved, but torque density becomes low due to high weight from materials used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidtorque density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy friction-based mechanical components with lightweight magnetic elements. The magnetic brake system uses magnets and magnetic arrays that generate braking force through magnetic fields rather than mechanical friction, significantly reducing component weight while maintaining or enhancing torque density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If worm gears or screw-nut mechanisms are used, then non-backdrivability is achieved, but mechanical play at the output becomes high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidmechanical play
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical gear interfaces with magnetic field interactions. The magnetic brake creates a continuous force field that prevents backdriving without mechanical contact, eliminating the gaps and clearances inherent in gear-based systems and thereby reducing mechanical play at the output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Reliability

If friction-based mechanisms are used for non-backdriving, then non-backdrivability is achieved, but one sliding interface must use soft material with poor abrasion resistance (nylon or bronze)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidabrasion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates sliding friction interfaces entirely by using magnetic fields for braking. The magnetic brake system prevents backdriving through magnetic attraction and repulsion forces without physical contact between moving parts, eliminating wear and the need for soft, wear-resistant materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

6Reliability

If worm gears or screw-nut mechanisms are used, then non-backdrivability is achieved, but the overall footprint becomes large due to bulky dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-backdriving capabilityVSAvoidoverall footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces bulky mechanical gear components with compact magnetic elements. The magnetic brake system requires minimal space as it uses magnetic fields rather than large mechanical structures, significantly reducing the overall footprint of the actuator while maintaining non-backdriving capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism achieves high efficiency in forward motion, increased durability due to reduced contact stress, and compatibility with existing gearboxes, resulting in a compact, efficient, and cost-effective solution for robotic applications.

Implementation Method 1

the said braking element is movable from a non-braking condition, wherein the transmission of the motion from the input shaft to the output shaft is allowed, to a braking condition, wherein the transmission of the motion from the output shaft to the input shaft is prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250170730A1Non-backdriving rotation transmission mechanism
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 FOND INST ITAL DI TECH
  • US20250170730A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170730A1 patent drawing
  • US20250170730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Non-backdriving rotation transmission mechanism includes an input shaft, an output shaft, a fixed casing having a cylindrical cavity that includes a cylindrical braking surface, at least one braking element connected to the input shaft and output shaft and adapted to interact with said braking surface, and mechanism for actuating the braking element from a non-braking condition to a braking condition.The braking element includes two brake pads articulated to each other and each having at least one braking contact zone adapted to interact with said braking surface, which brake pads are movable from an engagement position wherein the contact zones are remote from each other and are in contact with said braking surface, to a free position wherein the contact zones are close to each other and are not in contact with said braking surface.