Self-locking Drill Chuck Dynamics and Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-locking drill chucks often fail to maintain a reliable self-locking state during high-speed operations due to inadequate retention force, leading to potential dislodgment under reaction forces.

Innovation Solution

A self-locking drill chuck design featuring a rotating sleeve with convex leaf springs at both ends, a nut with matching grooves, and a rotatable locking block that engages with teeth on the drill body, allowing for enhanced self-locking and unlocking through compression and rotation, ensuring a stronger holding force and improved operating feel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional self-locking structure with leaf spring and teeth is used in the drill chuck, then the structure can maintain self-locking state under normal conditions, but under high-speed rotation the retention force becomes inadequate leading to self-locking failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-locking reliabilityVSAvoidretention force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic self-locking mechanism where the locking block can rotate between locked and unlocked positions based on operational conditions. The locking block is positioned by the leaf spring under normal conditions, but can be rotated by the first part of the rotating sleeve during high-speed operation to engage additional teeth on the drill body, dynamically adapting the retention force to match operational demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The self-locking structure is segmented into multiple functional components: a locking block with multiple engagement positions, a leaf spring for initial positioning, and a rotating sleeve with distinct first and second parts. This segmentation allows each component to contribute differently to the self-locking mechanism under various operational conditions, with the locking block engaging different sets of teeth based on rotation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If the locking block is made rotatable to engage with teeth on the drill body for self-locking, then stronger holding force is achieved, but the structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidself-locking structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking block serves multiple functions: it is positioned by the leaf spring under normal conditions for standard self-locking, and can be rotated by the rotating sleeve to engage additional teeth when higher holding force is needed during high-speed operation. This multi-functionality allows a single component to adapt to different operational requirements without requiring entirely separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the leaf spring positioning mechanism with the rotating sleeve actuation mechanism into a unified self-locking system. The locking block integrates both the leaf spring engagement feature and the rotating sleeve engagement feature, combining two potential locking mechanisms into one cohesive structure that automatically selects the appropriate locking mode based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively maintains a self-locking state with a stronger holding force, preventing dislodgment and enhancing the operating experience by ensuring reliable engagement and disengagement of the drill chuck.

Implementation Method 1

by compressing the leaf spring via the first part, the leaf spring compresses the locking block, to rotate the locking block and engage with teeth on the drill body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

through compressing the locking block by the second part, the locking block reverses to break away from the tooth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS10166609B2Self-locking drill chuck
Publication Date: 2019.01.01 ZHE JIANG SAN OU MASCH CO LTD
  • US10166609B2 patent drawing
  • US10166609B2 patent drawing
  • US10166609B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provide a self-locking drill chuck, its rotating sleeve is provided with a convex leaf spring fixed to a rotating sleeve at both ends, its nut or ring fixedly connected with the nut are provided with a first groove and a second groove matching with the convex portion of the leaf spring; the self-locking structure includes a ring tooth on the drill body and rotatable locking block arranged on the nut or ring fixedly connected to the nut, the nut or ring fixedly connected to the nut is provided with a leaf spring, the rotating sleeve is provided with a first part compressing the leaf spring and a second part compressing the locking block. This invention can achieve positioning matching between metals, which has a stronger holding force for maintaining self-locking state of the drill chuck, greatly enhancing the operating feel.