Self-Locking Motorised Three-Point Lock With Tamper Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motorised locks require manual effort for closing and are vulnerable to tampering and unauthorized opening due to the use of load shafts and lack of self-locking mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A self-locking mechanical-motorised three-point lock with a central assembly and satellite transmissions, featuring a self-locking shaft and inhibiting system, which allows for frictionless closing and secure locking without load shafts, preventing manual or external tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If load shafts are used for closing operation, then closing force can be applied, but manual effort is required and security is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidmanual effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical load shaft system with an electrical motor system. The motor drives the deadbolts through a transmission mechanism, eliminating the need for manual loading of the load shaft. This substitution of mechanical effort with electrical actuation resolves the contradiction by providing closing force without requiring manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock system incorporates self-locking deadbolts that automatically secure themselves in the closed position without requiring continuous manual pressure or a separate locking mechanism. The deadbolts engage with the door frame and lock themselves, providing both closing force and security automatically once activated, thus eliminating the need for continuous manual effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If traditional mechanical locks are used, then manual opening is possible, but vulnerability to tampering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual openingVSAvoidsecurity against tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional key-cylinder mechanical opening mechanism with an electrical motor system. The motor is controlled by electronic signals, which can be provided by various means (cards, codes, biometrics, etc.), thereby eliminating the vulnerability of traditional mechanical cylinders to bumping, impressioning, and breaking attacks while maintaining convenient opening operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system between the user and the locking mechanism. Instead of direct mechanical key operation, an electronic control system mediates the opening process, providing enhanced security against tampering while maintaining ease of operation through various authentication methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If self-locking mechanism is added, then security is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unauthorized openingVSAvoidmechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the locking and self-locking functions into a single integrated deadbolt mechanism. The deadbolt serves both as the primary locking element and incorporates self-locking features that automatically secure it in place. This consolidation of functions reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall device structure while maintaining enhanced security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The deadbolt mechanism is designed to perform multiple functions: primary locking, self-locking, and resistance to forced entry. By making the deadbolt a multi-functional component rather than relying on separate mechanisms for each function, the patent reduces device complexity while achieving enhanced security against unauthorized opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Minimizes closing effort, enhances security by preventing unauthorized opening, and ensures durable, tamper-proof operation with electrical and mechanical controls.

Implementation Method 1

the lock incorporates a coil which, if energised, inhibits manual opening by the key-cylinder... the system has a coil that attracts an inhibiting lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic attraction: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentEP4585776A1Self-locking mechanical-motorised three-point lock
Publication Date: 2025.07.16 RA BA CIERRES ELECTRICOS
  • EP4585776A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4585776A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4585776A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The invention relates to a three-point lock with deadbolts and self-locking on the deadbolts with a central assembly (1), an upper assembly (1.1) and a lower assembly (1.2), wherein each assembly comprises a deadbolt (4, 4.1, 4.2) and wherein the central assembly (1) comprises a mechanical central transmission (16) and the upper and lower assemblies (1.1, 1.2) comprise satellite transmissions (7.1, 7.2) linked to the mechanical central transmission (16) via an upper espagnolette bolt (3.1) and a lower espagnolette bolt (3.2), so that when the mechanical central transmission (16) is moved in the closing direction, it moves the upper and lower satellite transmissions (7.1, 7.2) in the same direction, all the deadbolts (4, 4.1, 4.2) moving to the closed position. At least the central assembly (1) comprises a self-locking system.