Self-locking Rope Belay Device with Segmented Lever Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-locking belay devices for ropes are difficult to use, as they require significant force to transition between locked and unlocked positions, leading to jerky progress and difficulty in finding the correct braking position for continuous speed control.

Innovation Solution

A self-locking rope belay device with a cam and lever mechanism, where the lever has a support that contacts an abutment on the flange, allowing reduced effort in the initial unlocking stroke and direct control in the final stroke, enabling precise adjustment of braking force and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional self-locking belay device with a cam and lever mechanism is used, then the device can automatically lock onto the rope under tension, but the user encounters difficulty in finding the correct braking position and must exert significant force to transition between locked and unlocked positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic locking capabilityVSAvoiddifficulty in finding braking position and transitioning between positions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lever stroke is segmented into two distinct phases: an initial phase where the lever support contacts the flange abutment to provide reduced effort for unlocking, and a final phase where direct lever-to-cam contact provides precise control. This segmentation allows the user to easily transition from locked to unlocked state while maintaining reliable locking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the lever stroke provide different mechanical characteristics. The initial portion of the stroke features reduced mechanical advantage through flange abutment contact to minimize unlocking force, while the final portion provides direct lever-to-cam contact for precise braking control. This local differentiation of mechanical properties resolves the contradiction between ease of unlocking and precision of control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the lever is designed to provide direct control over the cam throughout its entire stroke, then precise adjustment of braking force is possible, but the force required to unlock the rope becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecise adjustment of braking forceVSAvoidforce required to unlock the rope
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The flange abutment acts as an intermediary element during the initial phase of lever actuation. When the lever moves from its rest position, the lever support contacts the abutment first, creating a mechanical advantage that reduces the force required to begin unlocking the rope. This intermediary contact allows easy unlocking while the lever gradually transitions to direct contact with the cam for precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the cam is designed to provide strong braking force when locked, then the device can securely hold the rope, but the user experiences jerky progress when attempting to unlock and scroll the rope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking force when lockedVSAvoidjerky progress during unlocking
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical advantage of the lever-cam system is dynamically changed during the unlocking process. The flange abutment provides a moving contact point that gradually transitions from supporting the lever (reducing unlocking force) to allowing direct lever-to-cam contact (increasing control precision). This dynamic adjustment of mechanical properties enables smooth transition from locked to unlocked state without jerky motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy and precise control over rope speed and braking force, reducing the energy required to unlock the rope and allowing smooth progression at desired speeds.

Implementation Method 1

a cam articulated on the flange to pinch the rope against the braking surface when the rope is under tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a cam articulated on the flange to pinch the rope against the braking surface when the rope is under tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the lever comprises a support coming into contact against an abutment of the flange substantially between the axes of articulation of the cam and of the lever when the lever is turned from its rest position to its active position, such that the actuation of the lever on the cam takes place with a reduced effect in an initial part of its unlocking stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentEP2301631B1Self-locking rope safety device
Publication Date: 2018.02.28 ZEDEL CORP
  • EP2301631B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2301631B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2301631B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The device has a cam (14) for clamping a rope when the rope is under tension, and a lever (58) acting on the cam to progressively release the rope by manual action on the lever. The lever acts on the cam with a geared-down effect in an initial part of release travel of the lever and with a direct effect in a final part of travel of the lever such that relative displacement of the cam with respect to the lever is smaller in the initial part than in the final part. A support of the lever has a stud (100) placed in a ring (106) having a diameter less than a diameter of the pin.