Self-Obscuring Tamper-Evident Labels for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing sophistication of tampering methods with stored value cards poses a challenge for customers and sales representatives to detect unauthorized tampering, leading to potential fraud, as they may not have the attention span to notice indicia indicating prior removal or deformation of tamper-evident labels.

Innovation Solution

Self-obscuring tamper-evident labels that incorporate machine-readable codes, which become unreadable by machines upon removal or tampering, utilizing indicia and deformation die-cuts to ensure unavoidable detection, thereby preventing fraudulent transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional tamper-evident labels with visible indicia are used, then customers and sales representatives can detect tampering, but the sophistication of tampering methods increases making detection difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper detection reliabilityVSAvoidtime for detection and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The label system performs self-validation through machine-readable codes that automatically indicate tampering status. The deformation die-cuts and indicia self-obscuration mechanisms enable the label to communicate its integrity status without requiring human inspection effort, thus resolving the contradiction between reliable detection and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection of tamper indicators with automated machine-readable code scanning. This substitution transforms the detection process from a time-consuming manual examination of indicia to a rapid automated scan, maintaining high reliability while dramatically reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sophisticated tampering methods are used by thieves, then the complexity of detection increases, but customers and sales representatives lack the attention span to detect tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering sophisticationVSAvoiddetection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The label system automatically communicates its tamper status through machine-readable codes that change state when tampered with. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for customers or sales representatives to actively search for or analyze complex tampering indicators, making detection as easy as scanning a barcode while maintaining effectiveness against sophisticated tampering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs visual changes in the machine-readable codes and indicia that occur when tampering takes place. These changes provide an immediate, easily detectable signal that complements the automated scanning system, allowing anyone to quickly assess label integrity without requiring specialized attention or expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Productivity

If machine-readable codes are used for automatic validation, then processing speed increases, but the codes become readable even when the label is tampered with

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidfraud prevention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the label into multiple functional layers: the base label with machine-readable codes for rapid processing, and the deformation die-cut indicia layer for tamper detection. This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously achieve fast automated validation through code scanning while maintaining fraud prevention reliability through the tamper-evident deformation mechanisms that render codes unreadable when tampered with.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The label system combines multiple materials and mechanisms into a composite structure: machine-readable code layers for automated processing, deformation die-cut layers for tamper indication, and self-obscuring indicia for additional security. This composite approach enables the label to provide both rapid automated validation and reliable fraud prevention simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11760069B1Systems and methods for self-obscuring tamper-evident labels
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 ADCRAFT INC
  • US11760069B1 patent drawing
  • US11760069B1 patent drawing
  • US11760069B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for using, configuring, and manufacturing self-obscuring tamper-evident labels can include producing labels that have adhesive and non-adhesive sides. The non-adhesive side can be configured to receive printing such as machine-readable codes. The labels typically have multiple layers which can be configured for various tasks. For example, one layer can be configured as an irreversible void material that generates indicia upon receiving a certain tension associated with removal from a surface. Another layer may be configured to ease the removal of the label from a surface while another generates deformations under tension. The indicia, deformations, and machine-readable code printed on the non-adhesive side can be configured such that when activated, the indicia render the machine-readable code unreadable via machine. These labels can be utilized as security labels designed to indicate prior removal as well as other applications that can benefit from quick removal and prior removal indication.