Self-optimizing network balancing coverage and capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication networks face challenges in optimizing coverage, capacity, and interference simultaneously, with existing algorithms often conflicting and neglecting uplink considerations, leading to suboptimal performance, especially at the cell edge where user satisfaction is poorest.

Innovation Solution

The technology jointly optimizes coverage, capacity, and layer balance by modifying antenna parameters, handover biases, scheduling priorities, and interference mitigation, considering both uplink and downlink aspects to achieve synergistic improvements while maintaining minimum cell edge user performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If coverage optimization is performed by increasing antenna uptilt, then coverage is improved, but capacity deteriorates due to antenna downtilt requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidnetwork capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of antenna parameters (electrical tilt, azimuth, power) based on real-time network conditions and user distribution. Instead of static optimization, the system continuously adapts antenna configurations to balance coverage and capacity requirements, allowing the network to transition between coverage-mode and capacity-mode operations as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple antenna parameters simultaneously (tilt angle, azimuth direction, transmit power) rather than adjusting single parameters in isolation. This multi-parameter optimization allows the network to achieve both improved coverage and maintained capacity by coordinating changes across different antenna characteristics to produce synergistic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If separate independent optimization algorithms are used for coverage, capacity and interference, then each optimization can be performed independently, but the algorithms counteract each other and overall performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent optimization capabilityVSAvoidoverall network performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges separate optimization algorithms into a unified joint optimization framework that simultaneously considers coverage, capacity, and interference objectives. The system integrates multiple optimization goals into a single coordinated optimization process, eliminating counteracting effects while maintaining the ability to address each objective through specialized sub-routines that work together harmoniously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization system performs multiple functions simultaneously - it optimizes for coverage, capacity, and interference reduction in a single unified process. The algorithm is designed to handle diverse optimization objectives with a single multi-functional framework, making the system versatile enough to address various network conditions and performance requirements without needing separate independent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Area of stationary object

If downlink coverage optimization is prioritized, then downlink performance is improved, but uplink performance deteriorates due to neglected uplink considerations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownlink coverage areaVSAvoiduplink coverage reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates equipotential optimization by treating uplink and downlink coverage with equal importance and applying symmetric optimization principles to both directions. The joint optimization algorithm balances uplink and downlink performance metrics, ensuring that improvements in one direction do not come at the expense of the other, thereby achieving equitable performance across both transmission directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor both uplink and downlink performance metrics simultaneously. By measuring actual uplink coverage conditions and feeding this information back into the optimization process, the system can adjust antenna parameters to maintain balanced uplink-downlink performance, preventing downlink-optimized configurations from degrading uplink service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11246042B2Unified self-optimizing network to increase cell edge performance
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US11246042B2 patent drawing
  • US11246042B2 patent drawing
  • US11246042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described technology is generally directed towards jointly optimizing coverage, capacity, and layer balance in a wireless communications network while maintaining cell edge use device performance constraints. Aspects comprise monitoring edge user devices for performance information, and modifying the network based on the performance information, including jointly optimizing by changing antenna parameter data, layer balancing, handover biasing per cell neighbor pair, modifying scheduling priorities, and optimizing sector face harmonic throughput. Balancing uplink and downlink coverages are considered in the joint optimization. Further, interference is detected, predicted (as needed) and mitigated.