Self-Organized Critical Image Segmentation Avoiding Local Minima

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image segmentation methods, such as Simulated Annealing, are computationally inefficient and prone to getting trapped in local minima, requiring parameter tuning and restarts, while random search methods often fail to provide suitable solutions due to getting stuck in local minima.

Innovation Solution

A self-organized critical image segmentation system that generates delta patterns from a self-organized critical process to alter initial test patterns, using a computer model of a sand pile to optimize pixel labels and reduce energy scores, allowing for efficient separation of foreground objects from background imagery without requiring parameter tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Simulated Annealing is used for image segmentation, then the algorithm can escape local minima, but it requires parameter tuning and is computationally inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to escape local minimaVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-organized criticality where the optimization process automatically adjusts its own behavior through delta patterns generated by the SOC process. The algorithm serves itself by using the inherent dynamics of the sand pile model to guide the search, eliminating the need for external parameter tuning while maintaining efficient computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed-parameter optimization (Simulated Annealing requires T0 and k) to dynamic parameter adjustment through self-organized criticality. The delta patterns automatically adapt the search strategy based on the current state of the optimization, achieving both efficiency and reliability without manual parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If Simulated Annealing is used for image segmentation, then the algorithm can avoid local minima, but it requires restarts with new pre-defined annealing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization effectivenessVSAvoidtime for restarts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The self-organized criticality process provides continuous optimization without requiring restarts. The delta patterns are generated continuously as the sand pile evolves, allowing the optimization to proceed smoothly from one state to another without interruption or need for reinitialization, thus eliminating time loss from restarts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the optimization process through the evolving sand pile model. The delta patterns change automatically as the system state changes, providing a dynamic search strategy that continues effectively without needing to restart with new pre-defined steps, thereby saving time while maintaining optimization reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If random search is used for optimization, then the process is simple, but it gets trapped into local minima

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of search processVSAvoidability to find optimal solution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into discrete delta patterns generated by the self-organized criticality process. Each delta pattern represents a specific change pattern that can be applied to the test pattern, breaking down the complex optimization into manageable segments that collectively guide the search away from local minima while maintaining relative simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The self-organized criticality process acts as an intermediary between simple random search and complex optimization algorithms. It takes the simplicity of random search and transforms it through the sand pile dynamics into a more effective search strategy that avoids local minima, providing a middle ground between simplicity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If Simulated Annealing is used for image segmentation, then the algorithm optimizes energy functions, but it depends critically on annealing parameters T0 and k

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy minimization accuracyVSAvoidparameter tuning requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates parameter tuning by using self-organized criticality to automatically generate appropriate search patterns. The sand pile model self-adjusts its dynamics based on the problem structure, providing optimization patterns that are adaptively suited to the energy function without requiring manual selection of T0 or k parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical annealing parameter control system with a self-organized criticality system. Instead of controlling temperature parameters T0 and k, the system uses the inherent dynamics of the sand pile model to generate delta patterns, substituting parameter-based control with a self-regulating physical model that achieves the same optimization function without parameter dependency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10580142B1System and method for self-organized critical image segmentation
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 HRL LAB
  • US10580142B1 patent drawing
  • US10580142B1 patent drawing
  • US10580142B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for self-organized critical image segmentation. During operation, the system generates a delta pattern from a self-organized critical process. An initial test pattern is then altered based on the delta pattern to generate a new test pattern. The new test pattern is a mask identifying distinct regions in an image. A new energy score is then generated of the new test pattern. The operations of generating the delta pattern and altering the initial test pattern are then repeated until an energy score of the new test pattern is less than an energy score of the initial test pattern. At that point, the initial test pattern is replaced with the new test pattern. Finally, the process is repeated until a termination condition is reached, at which point the new test pattern provides the image segmentation by dividing the image into distinct regions, including a foreground and background.