Self-Propelled Locking System for Extrusion Tool Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing co-extrusion installations for producing complex profiles require heavy and bulky locking systems to ensure waterproofing and rigidity, which complicate maintenance, increase costs, and affect the installation's grounding.

Innovation Solution

A compact and lightweight self-contracted lock system is introduced, featuring a mobile bit and a locking engine coupled with a draft to provide a direct and efficient tightening mechanism, allowing for rapid tool block changes with reduced energy expenditure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a heavy and bulky locking system is used to guarantee sealing and rigidity against high working pressures, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing and rigidityVSAvoidlocking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into multiple independent locking members (first lock, second lock) that can be individually controlled. Each locking member has its own locking motor and tie rod, allowing distributed application of clamping force across the joint plane, thereby achieving reliable sealing and rigidity without requiring a single bulky locking mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional bulky mechanical locking systems with electromechanical actuators (locking motors coupled to tie rods). This substitution enables precise control of clamping force while reducing overall system complexity and maintenance requirements, as the electromechanical system allows for controlled operation and monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a heavy and bulky locking system is used to ensure robust locking, then reliability is improved, but the footprint of the installation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking robustnessVSAvoidinstallation footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is segmented into multiple compact locking members distributed across the joint plane. Each locking member is a compact unit with integrated motor and tie rod, eliminating the need for a single large bulky locking system while maintaining robust locking through distributed clamping forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking members are arranged in a distributed pattern across the joint plane (in the coupling direction), rather than concentrating locking mechanisms in one location. This spatial distribution allows robust locking to be achieved across the entire interface area without increasing the overall installation footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a heavy and bulky locking system is used to guarantee sealing, then reliability is improved, but maintenance duration and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing guaranteeVSAvoidmaintenance operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is segmented into multiple independent locking members, each with its own motor and tie rod. This modular architecture allows individual locking members to be maintained or replaced independently, significantly reducing maintenance duration and cost compared to a monolithic locking system where any issue requires complete system shutdown and complex disassembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking members are designed to be movable and controllable, allowing for dynamic adjustment and easy access during maintenance operations. The independent control of each locking member enables selective maintenance without affecting the entire locking system, improving ease of repair while maintaining sealing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the locking system is made simpler and more compact, then device complexity is reduced, but the clamping force generation capability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking system simplicityVSAvoidclamping force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The total clamping force requirement is distributed across multiple locking members instead of requiring a single large locking mechanism. Each locking member generates a portion of the total clamping force through its tie rod acting on the joint plane, achieving the required overall clamping force while keeping each individual locking member simple and compact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping force is applied across the entire joint plane through multiple distributed locking members rather than concentrating force at a single point. This distributes the force application area, allowing each locking member to be simpler while the collective system achieves the necessary total clamping force for reliable sealing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

5Productivity

If the amplitude of movement of locking members is reduced, then productivity is improved through faster tool block changes, but the locking mechanism may require more precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool block change speedVSAvoidlocking mechanism precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The locking members are designed with controlled movement characteristics, where the amplitude of movement is optimized to achieve rapid locking and unlocking while maintaining sufficient engagement. The electromechanical actuators provide precise control over the movement trajectory and stopping position, enabling fast operation without sacrificing the precision needed for reliable locking engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The use of electromechanical actuators (locking motors with tie rods) replaces traditional purely mechanical locking mechanisms. This substitution enables precise control of the locking members' movement through electrical signals, allowing for rapid and repeatable positioning with high precision even over short movement distances, thereby supporting both high productivity and manufacturing precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The self-contracted lock system achieves a robust and reliable locking mechanism while minimizing the complexity and cost of maintenance, and it allows for precise and rapid switching between closing and opening configurations.

Implementation Method 1

the locking motor can act in traction on the tie rod, against the anchoring point, in order to approach, with said jaw, said anchoring point, in the locking direction, so that said jaw generates the clamping force which presses the first head against the tool block

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP4090512B1Extrusion installation having a locking system with self-propelled locks
Publication Date: 2025.04.30 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • EP4090512B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4090512B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4090512B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The present invention relates to an extrusion installation (1) comprising at least one first head (2) which is designed to receive a first extruder (3), a tool block (5) which comprises a nozzle (6) designed to shape a profiled element, a first lock (10) for applying a clamping force (F10) that presses the first head (2) against the tool block (5) in a first coupling direction (X), and wherein the first lock (10) comprises a first jaw (11) which is mounted so as to be movable in a second locking direction (Y), transverse to the coupling direction (X), and at least one locking motor (12) which is on-board said first jaw (11) and coupled to a tie rod (13) which is designed to exert traction against an anchoring point (14) provided in the first head (2), in order to move the first jaw (11) towards the anchoring point (14) such that said first jaw (11) generates the clamping force (F10).