Self-Purging Droplet Generator Bubble Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Air bubbles trapped in the firing chambers of thermal inkjet printheads prevent drop ejection, leading to print defects and reduced print quality due to gas absorption and nucleation in the fluid, which is exacerbated by elevated temperatures during printing.

Innovation Solution

Designing a self-purging droplet generator with a more restrictive inlet geometry and a larger nozzle radius to encourage bubbles to expand and break through the nozzle, allowing fluid to refill the chamber and maintain operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the inlet geometry is made more restrictive to prevent bubble entry, then bubble trapping is reduced, but fluid flow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble-free operationVSAvoidfluid flow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The inlet geometry features localized restrictive structures (ridges or constrictions) at specific positions within the inlet passage, rather than uniformly restricting the entire inlet. This allows bubble prevention at critical locations while maintaining adequate fluid flow paths, resolving the contradiction between bubble trapping prevention and fluid flow resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The restrictive inlet geometry acts as an intermediary structure that selectively interacts with bubbles versus fluid. The geometry is designed to trap or redirect bubbles while allowing fluid to pass through, serving as a mediator between the reservoir and firing chamber that prevents harmful bubble entry without creating excessive flow resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the nozzle radius is increased to facilitate bubble ejection, then bubble removal is improved, but droplet ejection precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble ejection capabilityVSAvoiddroplet ejection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle radius is optimized to specific parameter ranges that balance bubble ejection capability with droplet precision. By carefully selecting the nozzle radius within a defined range, the design achieves sufficient size for bubble passage while maintaining the precision required for accurate droplet ejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The nozzle geometry may feature asymmetric characteristics where the exit radius is optimized for bubble ejection while other dimensional parameters maintain droplet precision. This asymmetric optimization allows different parts of the nozzle to serve different functions - larger dimensions for bubble removal, smaller dimensions for precise droplet control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If thermal energy is applied to vaporize fluid and eject droplets, then droplet ejection is achieved, but gas comes out of solution forming bubbles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet ejection rateVSAvoidbubble formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictive inlet geometry is positioned to trap bubbles before they can enter the firing chamber and interfere with droplet ejection. This preliminary action of bubble trapping at the inlet prevents bubbles from disrupting the thermal vaporization process and droplet formation, allowing continuous high-rate ejection without bubble-related interruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The design extracts or removes bubbles from the system through the combination of restrictive inlet geometry (which traps bubbles at the inlet) and enlarged nozzle (which allows bubble ejection). This extraction of harmful bubbles from the fluid path prevents them from interfering with the thermal droplet ejection process, maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The self-purging design effectively removes bubbles from the firing chamber, ensuring consistent droplet ejection and improved print quality without increasing system complexity or cost, applicable to various fluid dispensing applications beyond traditional printing.

Implementation Method 1

heating elements to vaporize small portions of the fluid within a firing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

The vapor rapidly expands, forcing a small droplet out of the orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

the vapor rapidly collapses, drawing more fluid into the firing chamber from a reservoir

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

The fluids stored in the reservoir and dispensed through the orifices can absorb and hold gases, such as atmospheric nitrogen, oxygen, or carbon dioxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 5

these gases can come out of the solution and form bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas nucleation: Nucleation

Data Source

PatentUS8919938B2Droplet generator
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US8919938B2 patent drawing
  • US8919938B2 patent drawing
  • US8919938B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A droplet generator (100, 600, 700) having a bubble purging fluidic architecture comprises a firing chamber (110, 610, 710); an inlet (155, 655) fluidically connecting the firing chamber (110, 610, 710) to a fluid reservoir (140, 640, 740); and an outlet (120, 400, 620, 720) configured to pass fluid droplets being ejected from the firing chamber (110, 610, 710). The geometry of the outlet (120, 400, 620, 720) and the geometry of the inlet (155, 655) are configured such that the outlet (120, 400, 620, 720) geometry has a substantially lower barrier to expansion or motion of a bubble (300, 310, 410) than the inlet (155, 655) geometry.