Integrated Self-Regulating Cooling Loops for Data Center Power Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data center cooling systems struggle to efficiently manage high thermal and power densities, requiring inefficient and non-scalable designs that fail to integrate thermal and electrical systems for effective power and cooling management, especially with fluctuating demands.

Innovation Solution

A self-regulating architecture with a primary and secondary cooling loop, powered by a photovoltaic system and energy storage, dynamically adjusts cooling capacity based on vapor pressure to meet varying thermal loads, integrating thermal and electrical systems for efficient, scalable, and reliable cooling and power distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If existing cooling systems are designed to meet high power density demands, then cooling capacity is improved, but system complexity and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is divided into multiple independent zones, each with its own evaporator and cooling loop. This segmentation allows each zone to be controlled independently based on local thermal demands, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high cooling capacity for high power density racks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control mechanisms that adjust cooling capacity in real-time based on fluctuating thermal and power demands. Variable speed pumps and controllable valves enable the system to adapt to changing conditions, maintaining efficiency without requiring oversized fixed-capacity infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If power density is increased to meet computational demands, then processing capability is improved, but thermal management difficulty and cooling requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidthermal management
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system provides localized cooling solutions tailored to specific high power density racks. Each rack or zone can be equipped with cooling capacity proportional to its power density, ensuring that thermal management is optimized locally rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling infrastructure is designed to serve multiple functions: it can accommodate varying power densities across different racks, provide both base and peak cooling capacity, and adapt to different computational workloads. This multi-functionality allows the system to support high power density without proportionally increasing overall cooling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If cooling buffers are designed to meet peak demands, then reliability is improved, but efficiency and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling reliabilityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor thermal conditions and power consumption, dynamically adjusting cooling output to match actual demands. This feedback control ensures reliable cooling during peak loads while minimizing energy waste during low-demand periods, eliminating the need for permanently oversized cooling buffers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters such as fluid flow rates, pump speeds, and valve positions in response to varying thermal and power conditions. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain reliability during peak demands while optimizing efficiency during normal operation, avoiding the energy losses associated with fixed high-capacity cooling buffers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If thermal and electrical systems are operated separately, then system simplicity is maintained, but integrated power and cooling management efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges thermal and electrical management into an integrated control architecture that coordinates power distribution with cooling provision. This integration enables optimized matching of power delivery to computational workloads while simultaneously adjusting cooling capacity, improving overall energy efficiency without significantly increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances cooling performance, reliability, and power efficiency while reducing costs, meeting high heat and power density demands with scalable and sustainable solutions.

Implementation Method 1

powered by a photovoltaic system and energy storage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Implementation Method 2

a primary cooling loop having a primary condenser to remove heat from one or more information technology (IT) components using a cooling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

a sensor to monitor a vapor pressure of the cooling liquid; a secondary cooling loop having a secondary condenser, the secondary condenser being configured to be connected to close the secondary cooling loop to supplement the primary cooling loop to remove heat from the IT components when the vapor pressure of the cooling liquid exceeds a threshold value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor pressure: Vapour Pressure

Data Source

PatentEP4054300B1Full system self-regulating architecture
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 BAIDU USA LLC
  • EP4054300B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4054300B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4054300B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is an integrated thermal and electrical system with self-regulating capabilities to provide enhanced cooling capacity and auxiliary power. The system includes two cooling loops, a primary cooling loop whose cooling capacity is fixed and a secondary cooling loop that supplements the primary cooling loop when the cooling capacity of the primary cooling loop is insufficient. The two cooling loops may use a phase change fluid whose vapor pressure is monitored to control the cooling capacity of the secondary cooling loop to respond to fluctuating thermal load. The system includes two types of energy sources such as a photovoltaic system and a power storage. The photovoltaic system may power the secondary cooling loop to control the fluid flow rate or the airflow rate through the secondary cooling loop based on the vapor pressure. The photovoltaic system may charge the power storage when not powering the secondary cooling loop.