Self-Steering Axle Locking Mechanism and Indicator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior art self-steering wheeled vehicles, such as hay balers, experience vibrations and mechanical failures at high speeds and instability on uneven terrain due to unreliable self-steering mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A self-steering wheel system with an operator-actuated locking mechanism that allows the wheel to be selectively locked into a straight-ahead position, combined with a wheel lockout indicator system to confirm the locking status, preventing self-steering and enhancing stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If self-steering wheels are used to allow wheels to pivot in response to ground forces, then the vehicle can turn more easily on uneven terrain, but the vehicle becomes unstable and experiences vibrations at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-steering capabilityVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies dynamics by making the wheel steering capability adjustable rather than fixed. The wheels can dynamically switch between self-steering mode (for adaptability on uneven terrain) and locked straight-ahead position (for stability at high speeds). This resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to adapt its behavior based on operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of wheel steering freedom from always free to selectively constrained. By introducing a locking mechanism that can restrict wheel pivoting, the system modifies the degree of freedom parameter to resolve the stability issue while preserving self-steering capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If self-steering wheels are used to allow wheels to pivot in response to ground forces, then the vehicle can navigate terrain more flexibly, but mechanical failures occur due to unreliable self-steering mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-steering capabilityVSAvoidmechanical reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the problematic self-steering function from the wheel system when it causes reliability issues. By providing a locking mechanism that can disengage the self-steering capability, the system removes the source of mechanical failures while preserving the ability to re-enable self-steering when conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism provides preliminary anti-action by preventing the wheel from pivoting when self-steering would be unreliable. This preemptive constraint avoids the mechanical failures that would occur with uncontrolled self-steering, especially at high speeds or on uneven terrain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Stability of the object's composition

If a locking mechanism is added to restrict self-steering, then vehicle stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be operator-actuated, making the system self-service in terms of control. The operator directly controls the locking/unlocking based on observed conditions, eliminating the need for complex automated sensors and control systems while still achieving the stability benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex automated system to maintain stability, the invention inverts the approach by using a simple manual locking mechanism. The complexity is shifted from the mechanical system to the operator's decision-making, resulting in a simpler overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If an indicator system is added to confirm locking status, then operator awareness and control improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidindicator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator system uses color changes (green LED for unlocked, red LED for locked) to communicate wheel locking status to the operator. This simple visual signaling method provides clear operator feedback without requiring complex electronic systems, displays, or interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator system provides immediate feedback to the operator about the current locking status of the wheels. This feedback mechanism ensures the operator is aware of the system state, improving control and safety while using a simple implementation that minimizes added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7866680B2Steering lock indicator for self-steering axle
Publication Date: 2011.01.11 AGCO CORP
  • US7866680B2 patent drawing
  • US7866680B2 patent drawing
  • US7866680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A land vehicle includes a wheeled axle that is operable to be selectively self-steering. The axle includes a ground wheel that is operable to be selectively locked into a straight-ahead position so that self-steering is restricted. The land vehicle also includes a wheel lockout indicator system that is operable to sense when the ground wheel is locked in the straight-ahead position and can alert an operator by confirming that the ground wheel has been locked in the straight-ahead position.