Self-Supervised Threat Detection for Early Malicious Behavior Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional threat detection systems often fail to identify malicious behavior until after an attack has already begun, as they rely on predefined indicators that may not capture early signs of potential threats.

Innovation Solution

A self-supervised learning approach that utilizes unsupervised learning to process activity data and generate threat data, which is then used to train supervised machine learning models to predict sequences of activities that could lead to malicious actions, enabling early detection and proactive security measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional threat detection systems use predefined indicators to score behavioral sequences, then they can identify known malicious patterns, but they fail to detect early signs of novel threats that do not match existing indicators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidability to detect novel threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user behavior sequences to identify patterns that precede malicious actions. By analyzing behavioral sequences and predicting future states, the system detects early signs of threats before they manifest as confirmed malicious activities, enabling proactive security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-supervised learning where the model learns to predict its own future states by analyzing behavioral sequences. The model is trained to predict whether a user will perform malicious actions based on their behavioral patterns, allowing the system to adapt to novel threats without requiring predefined indicators for each specific threat type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If threat detection systems rely on predefined malicious behavior indicators, then they can provide structured analysis, but they cannot capture subtle early signs of potential threats that appear benign

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructured analysis capabilityVSAvoidsubtle threat indicators
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from analyzing isolated security events to analyzing sequential behavioral patterns across multiple dimensions. By processing behavioral sequences and temporal patterns, the system captures subtle indicators that distributed across multiple actions and time periods, which would be invisible when analyzing individual events in isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary prediction of malicious behavior by analyzing behavioral sequences before malicious actions occur. This allows the system to identify subtle early signs that precede confirmed threats, capturing information that traditional reactive detection methods would miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional systems analyze malicious behavior indicators after attacks begin, then they can respond to confirmed threats, but they cannot provide early warning for preemptive security measures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response capabilityVSAvoiddetection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of malicious behavior by analyzing behavioral sequences to forecast future malicious actions. By predicting whether users will perform malicious actions based on their behavioral patterns, the system provides early warning before attacks begin, enabling preemptive security measures while maintaining reliable threat response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from behavioral sequence analysis to continuously improve threat detection. By monitoring user behaviors and comparing predicted outcomes with actual events, the system refines its predictions and provides increasingly accurate early warnings, reducing detection delay while maintaining response reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12476990B2Method and system for early detection of malicious behavior based using self-supervised learning
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 SKYHAWK SECURITY
  • US12476990B2 patent drawing
  • US12476990B2 patent drawing
  • US12476990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computerized methods and systems obtain threat data generated from activity data using unsupervised learning. The activity data is collected from enterprises and describes activities performed on the enterprises. The threat data indicates likelihood that sequences of activities performed on the enterprises are indicative of malicious intent. A supervised ML model that processes sequential data is trained by providing a training set of sequential data to the supervised ML model. The training set includes at least some of the obtained threat data, and data derived from activity data collected from at least some of the enterprises. The trained supervised ML receives new data that describes a sequence of activities performed on an enterprise, and processes the received new data to produce a prediction of whether the sequence of activities performed on the enterprise will lead to a malicious action on the enterprise. In some embodiments, multiple supervised ML models are used.