Self-Supporting Additive Ceramic Core for Gas Turbine Casting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing processes for gas turbine engine components face challenges in creating self-supportive green cores during the firing process, as traditional methods require secondary ceramic setters, leading to increased costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the local elimination of additive manufacturing binder using a directional energy source, such as a laser, to form a thin outer skin on the core body, allowing it to be pre-sintered and self-supportive during the firing process, eliminating the need for secondary setters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional investment casting with weak ceramic cores is used, then complex internal cooling channel geometries can be achieved, but the cores collapse or crush during the solidification process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex internal cooling channel geometriesVSAvoidcore strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical and mechanical parameters of the core material by using binder jetting technology to create a core with significantly enhanced strength properties. The core transitions from a weak ceramic that collapses under traditional casting to a high-strength green ceramic that can support complex geometries during solidification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical support system (setters and props) with an inherently strong core structure created through binder jetting. The core's own mechanical properties are enhanced to the point where it becomes self-supporting, eliminating the need for additional mechanical support elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If secondary ceramic setters are used to support the core during firing, then the core shape is retained, but manufacturing costs and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore shape retentionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the core to support itself during the firing process through the pre-sintered outer skin that provides structural rigidity. The core becomes self-sufficient, eliminating the need for external setters or props that would otherwise be required to maintain shape during thermal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary sintering to the outer skin of the core before the main firing process. This pre-sintering action creates a rigid shell that maintains the core's geometric integrity during subsequent burning out and sintering operations, preventing deformation without requiring external support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If the green additive core is heated in an oven for burning out binder and sintering, then the core becomes strong, but thermal strains cause sag or deflection of the part

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore strengthVSAvoidgeometric shape
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary sintering to the outer skin of the core before the main firing process. This pre-sintering creates a rigid shell that maintains the core's geometric integrity during subsequent burning out and sintering operations, preventing deformation without requiring external support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies sintering selectively to the outer skin of the core, creating a localized region of high strength and rigidity. This outer shell has different properties than the inner core material, providing structural support where it is most needed to prevent thermal deformation during heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces thermal strains, prevents core cracking, and decreases processing costs by enabling the core to maintain its shape and structural integrity without additional support, thus enhancing manufacturing efficiency and reducing development time.

Implementation Method 1

A method involving the local elimination of additive manufacturing binder using a directional energy source, such as a laser, to form a thin outer skin on the core body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

allowing it to be pre-sintered and self-supportive during the firing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS10549338B2System and process to provide self-supporting additive manufactured ceramic core
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 RTX CORP
  • US10549338B2 patent drawing
  • US10549338B2 patent drawing
  • US10549338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A core for use in casting an internal cooling circuit within a gas turbine engine component, the core including a core body with an outer skin in which a core body additively manufacturing binder is locally eliminated. A method of manufacturing a core for casting a component, including casting a core body for at least partially forming an internal passage architecture of a component; and forming an outer skin on the core body in which a core body binder is locally eliminated.