Self-Supporting Microfluidic Walls for Sacrificial-Free 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for fabricating microfluidic devices, such as soft lithography and additive manufacturing, face challenges like contamination from residual materials, low elasticity, and alignment issues, particularly when printing onto substrates with pre-deposited structures or electronic sensing elements.

Innovation Solution

Extrusion-based 3D printing techniques that use viscoelastic inks to form self-supporting microfluidic structures without sacrificial materials, allowing for direct alignment and printing onto planar or non-planar substrates with minimal postprocessing, and enabling the creation of hollow structures with sufficient mechanical strength to withstand gravitational loading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sacrificial materials are used to form hollow structures in 3D printing, then the mechanical strength during printing is improved, but contamination from residual materials occurs and postprocessing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of as-printed structureVSAvoidcontamination from residual materials
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the sacrificial material component entirely from the printing process. Instead of printing with support materials and then removing them, the method directly prints self-supporting hollow structures using viscoelastic inks that maintain structural integrity during and after printing without requiring any sacrificial materials to be extracted or removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The viscoelastic ink serves dual functions: it provides the structural material for the hollow walls and simultaneously provides its own viscoelastic properties to support the structure during printing. The material self-supports the overhung portions through its yield strength, eliminating the need for separate sacrificial support materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If photo-curable resins are used in SL and MJM, then well-defined microchannels can be created, but the degree of automation is compromised due to necessary postprocessing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefinition of microchannelsVSAvoidautomation of printing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables continuous printing without interruption for postprocessing steps. The viscoelastic ink maintains structural support during printing, allowing the extrusion process to continue uninterrupted, and the structures remain self-supporting after printing without requiring additional processing steps to remove supports or clean residual materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the postprocessing requirement from the manufacturing workflow. By using viscoelastic inks that self-support, the method eliminates the need for postprocessing steps such as removing sacrificial materials, cleaning residual precursors, or supporting overhung structures, thereby achieving fully automated printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Stability of the object's composition

If rigid enclosing members are used to enclose printed hollow structures, then structural stability is improved, but the form factor constraints increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stability of hollow structureVSAvoidform factor of printed device
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from rigid to viscoelastic. The viscoelastic ink maintains sufficient yield strength to support the hollow structure during and after printing, while allowing the final device to remain flexible and adaptable to different form factors, including non-planar substrates and wearable applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite or blended polymeric materials that exhibit viscoelastic behavior, combining the structural support capabilities of rigid materials with the flexibility and adaptability of elastic materials. This allows the hollow structures to maintain stability while being enclosable without rigid roofs or enclosing members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Manufacturing precision

If manual alignment steps are used in soft lithography, then alignment precision can be achieved, but the manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces manual mechanical alignment operations with automated computational methods. The system uses computational geometry and automated toolpath generation to calculate precise printing paths that ensure accurate alignment with pre-deposited structures, eliminating the need for manual measurement and positioning steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary computational calculations of the printing toolpath before actual printing begins. The system pre-calculates the optimal printing paths, angles, and positions based on the substrate geometry and desired microfluidic structure, enabling automated precise alignment without time-consuming manual intervention during the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the fabrication of microfluidic devices with self-supporting walls that can withstand small bending moments, form enclosed fluid passages, and integrate with pre-deposited structures, such as sensors, without the need for additional enclosing members, thus overcoming the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

By selecting polymeric materials with a suitable yield strength and controlling the profiles of printed overhung structures, self-supporting walls can be formed from viscoelastic polymeric materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectYield strength:

Implementation Method 2

self-supporting walls can be formed from viscoelastic polymeric materials without the need to incorporate additional sacrificial materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 3

The viscosity of the polymeric material used to form the structures is suitable to ensure low resistance to extrusion and sufficient mechanical strength to balance the gravitational torque of an overhung part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

hollow structures directly printed with uncured viscoelastic inks have shown insufficient mechanical strength to counter the creep of the as-printed structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCreep: Creep

Data Source

PatentUS11820061B2Additively manufactured self-supporting microfluidics
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US11820061B2 patent drawing
  • US11820061B2 patent drawing
  • US11820061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printed structure including a plurality of overlying layers of elongate polymeric filaments stacked on a surface of a substrate. The elongate polymeric filaments are stacked on each other along their lengths to form a liquid impermeable, self-supporting wall. The liquid impermeable self-supporting wall forms a wall angle of about 30° to about 90° with respect to a plane of the surface of the substrate.