Self-tuning KBA Authentication via Automated Pilot Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional knowledge-based authentication (KBA) systems that use pilot questions for feedback require manual evaluation by administrators, exposing sensitive information and risking errors, which is impractical for corporations lacking resources and increases the risk of information exposure.

Innovation Solution

Automating the analysis of pilot question results by determining communication factors such as font, fact source, and voice structure to generate new KBA questions, minimizing false negatives and allowing internal handling of feedback data without third-party expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual evaluation of pilot questions is used, then authentication effectiveness can be assessed, but sensitive information may be exposed and human errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication effectivenessVSAvoidinformation exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The KBA system automatically evaluates pilot question effectiveness using computational algorithms that analyze user responses and determine question quality metrics, eliminating the need for manual administrator evaluation and the associated information exposure risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual human evaluation processes are replaced with automated computational systems that use algorithms to assess pilot question performance, removing human administrators from the evaluation loop and eliminating risks of human error and information exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If manual evaluation by internal administrators is used, then information security is maintained, but resource requirements increase and errors remain risky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation exposure riskVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-evaluation of pilot questions through automated computational processes, eliminating the need for internal administrator resources while maintaining information security and removing human error risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Human administrator evaluation resources are replaced with automated computational systems that efficiently assess pilot question effectiveness without consuming human resources or introducing errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If pilot questions are used for authentication, then user verification is performed, but false negatives may occur due to ineffective question formats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidauthentication failures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pilot question results as feedback to automatically identify and eliminate question formats that produce false negatives, continuously improving authentication accuracy by analyzing which formats legitimate users answer incorrectly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes question format parameters (communication factors) based on pilot question performance data, automatically selecting formats that minimize false negatives while maintaining authentication security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8850537B1Self-tuning knowledge-based authentication
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US8850537B1 patent drawing
  • US8850537B1 patent drawing
  • US8850537B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved technique involves automatically producing a set of KBA questions using values of attributes associated with correctly answered questions. A KBA question server obtains such attribute values from a prior set of pilot questions taken from users who were successfully authenticated. Examples of attributes include a source of facts in a question, placement of facts in a question, and question structure. The KBA question server then generates optimal formatting rules based on the attribute values; such formatting rules define a relationship between facts used to derive KBA questions and the words used to express the KBA questions to users. The KBA question generator then produces KBA questions according to the formatting rules.