SEM Image Deconvolution for Sample Charging Artifact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of electrically insulating materials suffer from SEM-induced charging artifacts, leading to distorted representations of IC structures, which can result in false defect detection and reduced accuracy in inspection processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining two SEM images using different scanning parameters, such as directions or velocities, and applying convolution equations to generate a reduced sample charging effect image by retrieving and utilizing the point spread functions corresponding to each image, thereby minimizing SEM-induced charging artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If SEM imaging is performed on electrically insulating materials, then structural information can be obtained, but SEM-induced charging artifacts distort the image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage accuracyVSAvoidcharging artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scanning parameter (scan direction) to acquire multiple images with different charging artifact patterns. By rotating the scan direction by 90 degrees, the charging artifacts appear in different orientations in each image, allowing their mathematical separation from the true structural information through deconvolution operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a mathematical model (convolution equation) as an intermediary to separate the charging artifacts from the true image. The model represents the image formation process as I(x,y) = (O(x,y) ⊗ PSF(x,y)) + C(x,y), where the point spread function and charging artifact components can be independently solved and removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple SEM images are acquired with different scan directions, then charging artifacts can be reduced, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a minimal set of two images acquired with 90-degree rotated scan directions, which is sufficient to solve the system of convolution equations and remove charging artifacts. This partial action approach avoids the need for acquiring multiple images in many different directions, thereby reducing inspection time while still achieving effective artifact removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional averaging of multiple SEM images is used, then some charging artifacts are reduced, but image resolution and detail are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging artifactsVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple mechanical averaging operation with a sophisticated mathematical deconvolution process. Instead of merely averaging pixel values, the system solves convolution equations to mathematically separate and remove charging artifacts while preserving the true structural information, thereby maintaining image resolution and detail that would be lost in simple averaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in more accurate SEM images that faithfully represent the original structures, reducing false errors and improving defect detection accuracy by minimizing SEM-induced charging artifacts, thus enhancing the inspection process.

Implementation Method 1

scanning electron microscope (SEM) image... obtained from a first electron beam scan

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

SEM-induced charging artifacts... sample charging effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic field effect: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS20240005463A1SEM image enhancement
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20240005463A1 patent drawing
  • US20240005463A1 patent drawing
  • US20240005463A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method of reducing a sample charging effect in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image, the method comprising: obtaining a first SEM image from a first electron beam scan with a parameter being a first quantity; obtaining a second SEM image from a second electron beam scan with the parameter being a second quantity different from the first quantity; and generating a reduced sample charging effect image based on convolution equations comprising a representation of the first SEM image, a representation of the second SEM image, a first point spread function corresponding to the first SEM image and a second point spread function corresponding to the second SEM image.