Privacy-Preserving Semantic Communication via Adversarial Discriminators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep learning-based semantic communication systems face challenges in balancing privacy preservation and edge inference performance, particularly in scenarios like autonomous driving where privacy leakage and communication delays are concerns.

Innovation Solution

A privacy-preserving task-oriented semantic communication method and system that utilizes an information bottleneck and distortion function to construct a Lagrangian function, balancing privacy and edge inference performance. This approach employs adversarial learning, variational approximation, re-parameterization techniques, and Monte Carlo sampling to compute mutual information terms and deceive potential adversaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing privacy protection methods such as differential privacy are applied to semantic communication systems, then user privacy is protected, but the performance of semantic communication systems is significantly impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsemantic communication performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an adversarial discriminator as an intermediary component that prevents direct privacy attacks on the transmitted features. The discriminator acts as a mediator between the transmitter and potential adversaries, learning to distinguish real transmitted features from generated ones, thereby protecting privacy without directly degrading the semantic communication performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the training parameters and objective functions of the semantic communication system by incorporating adversarial loss terms. Instead of using traditional privacy protection parameters like differential privacy epsilon, the system uses adversarial game theory parameters (generator loss, discriminator loss) to achieve privacy protection while maintaining performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If deep learning techniques are used to directly transmit semantic features, then communication efficiency is improved, but privacy leakage issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidprivacy leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by training an adversarial discriminator before deployment to learn the distribution of legitimate transmitted features. This pre-trained discriminator serves as a defense mechanism that prevents model inversion attacks by making it computationally difficult for adversaries to reconstruct original inputs from transmitted features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of transmitted features being used for privacy attacks into a benefit by using adversarial training. The same transmitted features that could be exploited by adversaries are now used to train the discriminator, which then protects the system by identifying and preventing such attacks, turning the vulnerability into a security feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If all sensor data are directly transmitted for inference, then inference accuracy is improved, but communication delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference accuracyVSAvoidcommunication delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential semantic features from the full sensor data using deep learning feature extraction networks. Instead of transmitting all raw sensor data, the system extracts and transmits only the most relevant semantic features needed for autonomous driving decisions, significantly reducing communication bandwidth requirements and delay while maintaining inference accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250165809A1Privacy-preserving task-oriented semantic communication method and system
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 SHANDONG UNIV
  • US20250165809A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165809A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165809A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a privacy-preserving task-oriented semantic communication method and system, and the operation scenario includes a user, an edge server and a potential adversary which includes: (1) Establishing a privacy-oriented task-oriented semantic communication system model; (2) Constructing an objective function; (3) Reconstructing the constructed objective function; (4) Designing adversarial learning mechanisms to train the semantic communication system model; (5) Performing task-oriented semantic communication using the trained semantic communication system model. Compared to existing designs, the proposed solution in this invention achieves a good balance between privacy and utility.