Semantic Analysis Engine Caching for Source Code Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semantic analysis engines face inefficiencies in processing large amounts of data due to the need for extensive analysis and recalculations, especially in environments with frequent incremental updates, such as interactive programming systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a semantic analysis engine that uses immutable semantic objects and caching mechanisms to store and reuse derived information, allowing for responsive and accurate language services without requiring retransformation of domain representations upon changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive semantic analysis is performed on large amounts of source code, then complete and accurate semantic information is obtained, but processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic analysis accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs semantic analysis and caches results in advance. When source code objects are added or modified, the semantic model proactively computes and stores semantic characteristics before they are requested, so that subsequent queries can be answered quickly from the cache without performing full analysis again.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The semantic analysis is divided into incremental updates rather than complete reanalysis. When only small portions of source code change, only the affected semantic characteristics are recalculated and updated in the cache, while the rest of the semantic model remains unchanged and can be reused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If full semantic analysis is performed frequently to support incremental updates, then up-to-date semantic information is maintained, but system performance and responsiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic information freshnessVSAvoidsystem responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing complete semantic analysis on the entire source code base with every update, the system performs only partial analysis on the specific portions that have changed. The semantic model tracks which semantic characteristics depend on which source code objects and updates only those specific characteristics, performing less analysis than a full reanalysis would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-computes and caches semantic characteristics before they are needed. When source code is added or modified, the semantic model proactively updates the cache with new or changed semantic information, so that when queries are made, the information is already available and no computation is needed at query time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If semantic analysis is performed on every change to maintain accuracy, then semantic correctness is preserved, but computational overhead and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic correctnessVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The semantic model is segmented into individual characteristics, each with its own dependencies on source code objects. When source code changes, the system identifies which specific semantic characteristics are affected and updates only those, rather than recalculating all semantic characteristics. This segmentation allows selective updating that preserves correctness while reducing computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of the semantic model from requiring complete reanalysis to allowing incremental parameter updates. By tracking dependencies between source code objects and semantic characteristics, the system can modify individual parameters (semantic characteristics) based on what has changed, rather than changing all parameters through full reanalysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If immutable semantic objects are used to represent source code, then consistency and thread-safety are improved, but flexibility to handle incremental changes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic model consistencyVSAvoidincremental update capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates immutable semantic objects in advance that represent the source code structure. When source code changes, new immutable objects are created to represent the changes, while the old immutable objects remain valid for their original context. This allows the system to maintain immutability while adapting to changes through object creation rather than modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of modifying existing semantic objects when source code changes, the system creates copies of the affected objects with the updated information. The immutable semantic objects are copied and updated only where necessary, allowing the system to maintain consistency through immutability while adapting to incremental changes through selective copying and updating of the semantic model cache.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8539457B2Partial on-demand lazy semantic analysis
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8539457B2 patent drawing
  • US8539457B2 patent drawing
  • US8539457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computing responses to semantic queries. A method includes accessing a plurality of objects that represent source code for an input program. The source code is transformed into a plurality of immutable objects that are structured such that the immutable objects can be used to derive any response as defined by the semantic rules about the source code. A query is received from a requestor requesting a semantic characteristic of the input program. The semantic characteristic is calculated. The semantic characteristic is returned to the requestor. The semantic characteristic is cached in a cache. Information describing a dependency between the cached semantic characteristic and one or more of the objects in the plurality of objects is stored.