Semantic Image Segmentation Using Graph Cut Energy Minimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image segmentation techniques face challenges in accurately selecting objects from digital images, particularly in highly textured areas, often requiring tedious user interaction and struggling with trade-offs between ease of use and segmentation accuracy, while fully automated methods lack responsiveness to user input.

Innovation Solution

The technique enables digital image segmentation using semantic input, allowing users to specify objects or regions through language-based queries, which queries a database to gather positive and negative exemplars, validate object proposals, and apply a location prior and appearance models to an iterative graph cut energy minimization framework for precise segmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fully automated segmentation methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but responsiveness to user input deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidresponsiveness to user input
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions (clicks, selections) are continuously processed to refine and update segmentation results. The segmentation model receives feedback from user actions and adjusts its predictions accordingly, maintaining both automation and responsiveness to user intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The segmentation system dynamically adapts to user input by adjusting its parameters and focus in real-time. When users interact with the image or provide feedback, the system dynamically recalculates segmentation boundaries and object proposals, transitioning from static automated segmentation to dynamic user-responsive segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If traditional segmentation tools are used, then ease of operation deteriorates due to tedious user interaction, but measurement precision can be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service segmentation by automatically generating object proposals, identifying boundaries, and segmenting regions without requiring manual user interaction. The AI model independently analyzes the image, generates segmentation hypotheses, and produces results, eliminating the need for tedious manual operations while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical interaction (mouse clicks, brush strokes, region drawing) with an automated computational system. Instead of users manually defining regions through mechanical actions, the system uses computer vision algorithms and machine learning models to automatically detect and segment objects, substituting human manual operations with automated intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated methods process entire images, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates in highly textured areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsegmentation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation at multiple levels: first dividing the image into candidate object regions, then further segmenting those regions into precise boundaries. This hierarchical segmentation approach allows the system to focus computational resources on relevant areas, improving both processing efficiency and segmentation accuracy in complex textured regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing strategies to different regions of the image based on local characteristics. In highly textured areas, the model adjusts its analysis parameters and applies more sophisticated boundary detection algorithms, while in uniform regions it uses simpler methods, optimizing both speed and precision for each local area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9129191B2Semantic object selection
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 ADOBE INC
  • US9129191B2 patent drawing
  • US9129191B2 patent drawing
  • US9129191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed herein that enable digital images to be segmented based on a user's semantic input. In other words, given an input image of a person walking a dog adjacent to a tree, a user can simply provide the semantic input “dog” and the system will segment the dog from the other elements in the image. If the user provides other semantic input, such as “person” or “tree”, the system will segment the person or the tree, respectively, from the same image. Using semantic input advantageously eliminates any need for a user to directly interact with the input image through a tedious process of painting brush strokes, tracing boundaries, clicking target points, and/or drawing bounding boxes. Thus semantic input represents an easier and more intuitive way for users to interact with an image segmentation interface, thereby enabling novice users to take advantage of advanced image segmentation techniques.