Semantic Image Segmentation via Object Proposal Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image segmentation techniques face challenges in accurately selecting objects from digital images, particularly in highly textured areas, often requiring tedious user interaction and struggling with trade-offs between ease of use and accuracy, while fully automated methods lack responsiveness to user input.

Innovation Solution

The technique enables digital image segmentation using semantic input, allowing users to specify objects or regions through language-based queries, which queries a database to gather exemplar images, validate object proposals, and apply a location prior and appearance models to an iterative graph cut energy minimization framework for precise segmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fully automated segmentation methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but accuracy deteriorates due to lack of responsiveness to user input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidsegmentation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user input (semantic queries, clicks, or brush strokes) is processed to refine and update the segmentation results. The localization module uses user feedback to adjust object proposals and improve accuracy iteratively, resolving the contradiction between automated operation and accurate segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The segmentation system transitions from static automated methods to dynamic interactive segmentation. The system adapts its behavior based on user input intensity and type, adjusting the level of automation and refinement dynamically. This allows the system to maintain ease of operation while improving accuracy through user-guided adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If interactive segmentation tools are used, then accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to tedious user interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated object proposals and localization before user interaction. By pre-processing the image to generate candidate object regions and semantic understanding, the system reduces the amount of user interaction needed while maintaining high accuracy. Users only need to refine or confirm proposals rather than create segmentation from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses exemplar-based approaches where template objects or previously segmented regions are copied and adapted to current images. This allows the system to leverage existing segmentation knowledge to improve accuracy without requiring extensive new user input, effectively copying successful segmentation patterns to new contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If semantic input processing is added, then responsiveness to user input is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to user inputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The localization module serves multiple functions: it processes semantic queries, generates object proposals, localizes objects of interest, and refines segmentation based on user input. By making this single module multi-functional, the system achieves high responsiveness to various types of user input without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a localization module as an intermediary between user input and the segmentation engine. This intermediary translates diverse user inputs (semantic queries, clicks, brush strokes) into standardized object proposals and refinement signals, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high adaptability to different input types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If object proposal validation is performed, then segmentation accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation of object proposals rather than exhaustive validation of all possible regions. By focusing validation efforts on the most promising object proposals identified through semantic analysis and user input, the system achieves high segmentation accuracy without the time cost of validating every possible region in the image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process applies different levels of scrutiny to different object proposals based on their likelihood of being correct. High-confidence proposals from semantic matching receive minimal validation, while ambiguous proposals undergo more rigorous checking. This localized quality control maintains accuracy while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9129192B2Semantic object proposal generation and validation
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 ADOBE INC
  • US9129192B2 patent drawing
  • US9129192B2 patent drawing
  • US9129192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed herein that enable digital images to be segmented based on a user's semantic input. In other words, given an input image of a person walking a dog adjacent to a tree, a user can simply provide the semantic input “dog” and the system will segment the dog from the other elements in the image. If the user provides other semantic input, such as “person” or “tree”, the system will segment the person or the tree, respectively, from the same image. Using semantic input advantageously eliminates any need for a user to directly interact with the input image through a tedious process of painting brush strokes, tracing boundaries, clicking target points, and/or drawing bounding boxes. Thus semantic input represents an easier and more intuitive way for users to interact with an image segmentation interface, thereby enabling novice users to take advantage of advanced image segmentation techniques.