Semantic Keyword Mapping for Buyer-Seller Search Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-aided search technologies face challenges in accurately narrowing search results to the intended scope due to the ambiguity of keywords, leading to false hits and out-of-scope citations, especially in large search spaces like the web, as they fail to reliably map human-specified values and characteristics to the correct attributes in entity descriptions.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that maps lexical keywords into entity description semantics using a computer program and data storage mechanisms, allowing buyers to confirm unambiguous descriptions by scoring hierarchical category descriptions, suggesting attributes, and enabling dynamic user feedback to refine searches effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If lexical associations are injected iteratively into computer-aided searches, then the search space is narrowed rapidly, but the occurrence of false hits is not reliably eliminated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch space narrowing speedVSAvoidfalse hit elimination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where search results are continuously evaluated and used to refine subsequent search queries. The computer-aided search engine analyzes returned citations, identifies false hits, and adjusts lexical associations accordingly, creating an iterative improvement process that simultaneously narrows search space and reduces false positives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes search parameters including lexical associations, query weighting, and matching criteria based on accumulated search experience and feedback. By adjusting these parameters iteratively, the system optimizes both search efficiency and accuracy, resolving the contradiction between rapid narrowing and false hit elimination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a pure textual search is used with lexical refinements, then the search process is simple, but the mapping between keywords and attributes is ambiguous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch process simplicityVSAvoidkeyword to attribute mapping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of semantic analysis and attribute mapping between the user's lexical keywords and the search database. This intermediary process automatically interprets keywords, infers intended attributes, and constructs refined search queries, maintaining simplicity for users while achieving precise mapping through computational semantics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual keyword-attribute mapping with automated computational processes including natural language processing, semantic analysis, and machine learning algorithms. This substitution maintains ease of operation by eliminating manual intervention while dramatically improving mapping precision through intelligent algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If lexical search terms are refined through human-computer interactions, then the search becomes more specific, but out-of-scope citations still score hits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch term specificityVSAvoidsearch scope accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds additional evaluation dimensions beyond simple keyword matching, including semantic relevance, contextual analysis, and attribute-based filtering. By evaluating search results across multiple dimensions simultaneously, the system maintains high specificity while filtering out out-of-scope citations that might match refined keywords but fail on other relevance criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11409782B2Computer-aided extraction of semantics from keywords to confirm match of buyer offers to seller bids
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 INTERNET SEARCH PROTOCOLS LLC
  • US11409782B2 patent drawing
  • US11409782B2 patent drawing
  • US11409782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment involves a method and apparatus for mapping lexical keywords into entity description semantics in order to create unambiguous buyer-confirmed descriptions of entities. The method described herein relies on a computer program and some mechanism for computer data storage.